Mild bronchopulmonary dysplasia of newborn
Related entities
Findings (27)
None
declineBronchopulmonary dysplasia was the strongest neonatal comorbidity associated with gastrostomy tube placement in ELBW infants, with nearly 3-fold increased adjusted odds after controlling for center an
Effect: decline; OR 2.94; CI: 95% CI 2.20-3.92
None
declineBronchopulmonary dysplasia was the strongest neonatal comorbidity associated with gastrostomy tube placement in ELBW infants, with nearly 3-fold increased adjusted odds after controlling for center an
Effect: decline; OR 2.94; CI: 95% CI 2.20-3.92
None
declineBronchopulmonary dysplasia was the strongest neonatal comorbidity associated with gastrostomy tube placement in ELBW infants, with nearly 3-fold increased adjusted odds after controlling for center an
Effect: decline; OR 2.94; CI: 95% CI 2.20-3.92
None
declineBronchopulmonary dysplasia was the strongest neonatal comorbidity associated with gastrostomy tube placement in ELBW infants, with nearly 3-fold increased adjusted odds after controlling for center an
Effect: decline; OR 2.94; CI: 95% CI 2.20-3.92
None
declineBronchopulmonary dysplasia was the strongest neonatal comorbidity associated with gastrostomy tube placement in ELBW infants, with nearly 3-fold increased adjusted odds after controlling for center an
Effect: decline; OR 2.94; CI: 95% CI 2.20-3.92
None
declineBronchopulmonary dysplasia was the strongest neonatal comorbidity associated with gastrostomy tube placement in ELBW infants, with nearly 3-fold increased adjusted odds after controlling for center an
Effect: decline; OR 2.94; CI: 95% CI 2.20-3.92
None
declineBronchopulmonary dysplasia was the strongest neonatal comorbidity associated with gastrostomy tube placement in ELBW infants, with nearly 3-fold increased adjusted odds after controlling for center an
Effect: decline; OR 2.94; CI: 95% CI 2.20-3.92
None
declineBronchopulmonary dysplasia was the strongest neonatal comorbidity associated with gastrostomy tube placement in ELBW infants, with nearly 3-fold increased adjusted odds after controlling for center an
Effect: decline; OR 2.94; CI: 95% CI 2.20-3.92
None
declineBronchopulmonary dysplasia was the strongest neonatal comorbidity associated with gastrostomy tube placement in ELBW infants, with nearly 3-fold increased adjusted odds after controlling for center an
Effect: decline; OR 2.94; CI: 95% CI 2.20-3.92
None
declineBronchopulmonary dysplasia was the strongest neonatal comorbidity associated with gastrostomy tube placement in ELBW infants, with nearly 3-fold increased adjusted odds after controlling for center an
Effect: decline; OR 2.94; CI: 95% CI 2.20-3.92
None
declineBronchopulmonary dysplasia was the strongest neonatal comorbidity associated with gastrostomy tube placement in ELBW infants, with nearly 3-fold increased adjusted odds after controlling for center an
Effect: decline; OR 2.94; CI: 95% CI 2.20-3.92
None
declineBronchopulmonary dysplasia was the strongest neonatal comorbidity associated with gastrostomy tube placement in ELBW infants, with nearly 3-fold increased adjusted odds after controlling for center an
Effect: decline; OR 2.94; CI: 95% CI 2.20-3.92
None
declineBronchopulmonary dysplasia was the strongest neonatal comorbidity associated with gastrostomy tube placement in ELBW infants, with nearly 3-fold increased adjusted odds after controlling for center an
Effect: decline; OR 2.94; CI: 95% CI 2.20-3.92
None
declineBronchopulmonary dysplasia was the strongest neonatal comorbidity associated with gastrostomy tube placement in ELBW infants, with nearly 3-fold increased adjusted odds after controlling for center an
Effect: decline; OR 2.94; CI: 95% CI 2.20-3.92
None
declineBronchopulmonary dysplasia was the strongest neonatal comorbidity associated with gastrostomy tube placement in ELBW infants, with nearly 3-fold increased adjusted odds after controlling for center an
Effect: decline; OR 2.94; CI: 95% CI 2.20-3.92
None
declineBronchopulmonary dysplasia was the strongest neonatal comorbidity associated with gastrostomy tube placement in ELBW infants, with nearly 3-fold increased adjusted odds after controlling for center an
Effect: decline; OR 2.94; CI: 95% CI 2.20-3.92
None
declineBronchopulmonary dysplasia was the strongest neonatal comorbidity associated with gastrostomy tube placement in ELBW infants, with nearly 3-fold increased adjusted odds after controlling for center an
Effect: decline; OR 2.94; CI: 95% CI 2.20-3.92
None
declineBronchopulmonary dysplasia was the strongest neonatal comorbidity associated with gastrostomy tube placement in ELBW infants, with nearly 3-fold increased adjusted odds after controlling for center an
Effect: decline; OR 2.94; CI: 95% CI 2.20-3.92
None
declineBronchopulmonary dysplasia was the strongest neonatal comorbidity associated with gastrostomy tube placement in ELBW infants, with nearly 3-fold increased adjusted odds after controlling for center an
Effect: decline; OR 2.94; CI: 95% CI 2.20-3.92
None
declineBronchopulmonary dysplasia was the strongest neonatal comorbidity associated with gastrostomy tube placement in ELBW infants, with nearly 3-fold increased adjusted odds after controlling for center an
Effect: decline; OR 2.94; CI: 95% CI 2.20-3.92
None
declineBronchopulmonary dysplasia was the strongest neonatal comorbidity associated with gastrostomy tube placement in ELBW infants, with nearly 3-fold increased adjusted odds after controlling for center an
Effect: decline; OR 2.94; CI: 95% CI 2.20-3.92
None
declineBronchopulmonary dysplasia was the strongest neonatal comorbidity associated with gastrostomy tube placement in ELBW infants, with nearly 3-fold increased adjusted odds after controlling for center an
Effect: decline; OR 2.94; CI: 95% CI 2.20-3.92
None
declineBronchopulmonary dysplasia was the strongest neonatal comorbidity associated with gastrostomy tube placement in ELBW infants, with nearly 3-fold increased adjusted odds after controlling for center an
Effect: decline; OR 2.94; CI: 95% CI 2.20-3.92
None
declineBronchopulmonary dysplasia was the strongest neonatal comorbidity associated with gastrostomy tube placement in ELBW infants, with nearly 3-fold increased adjusted odds after controlling for center an
Effect: decline; OR 2.94; CI: 95% CI 2.20-3.92
None
declineBronchopulmonary dysplasia was the strongest neonatal comorbidity associated with gastrostomy tube placement in ELBW infants, with nearly 3-fold increased adjusted odds after controlling for center an
Effect: decline; OR 2.94; CI: 95% CI 2.20-3.92
None
declineBronchopulmonary dysplasia was the strongest neonatal comorbidity associated with gastrostomy tube placement in ELBW infants, with nearly 3-fold increased adjusted odds after controlling for center an
Effect: decline; OR 2.94; CI: 95% CI 2.20-3.92
None
declineBronchopulmonary dysplasia was the strongest neonatal comorbidity associated with gastrostomy tube placement in ELBW infants, with nearly 3-fold increased adjusted odds after controlling for center an
Effect: decline; OR 2.94; CI: 95% CI 2.20-3.92