HIV
Related entities
Findings (50)
None
declineHigher nicotine metabolite ratio was significantly associated with smoking more cigarettes per day among HIV-positive smokers, replicating the well-established NMR-smoking rate relationship in the gen
Effect: decline; r = .30, p = .001 (univariate); b = 0.188, p = 0.050 (multivariate)
None
declineHigher nicotine metabolite ratio was significantly associated with smoking more cigarettes per day among HIV-positive smokers, replicating the well-established NMR-smoking rate relationship in the gen
Effect: decline; r = .30, p = .001 (univariate); b = 0.188, p = 0.050 (multivariate)
None
declineHigher nicotine metabolite ratio was significantly associated with smoking more cigarettes per day among HIV-positive smokers, replicating the well-established NMR-smoking rate relationship in the gen
Effect: decline; r = .30, p = .001 (univariate); b = 0.188, p = 0.050 (multivariate)
None
declineHigher nicotine metabolite ratio was significantly associated with smoking more cigarettes per day among HIV-positive smokers, replicating the well-established NMR-smoking rate relationship in the gen
Effect: decline; r = .30, p = .001 (univariate); b = 0.188, p = 0.050 (multivariate)
None
declineHigher nicotine metabolite ratio was significantly associated with smoking more cigarettes per day among HIV-positive smokers, replicating the well-established NMR-smoking rate relationship in the gen
Effect: decline; r = .30, p = .001 (univariate); b = 0.188, p = 0.050 (multivariate)
None
declineHigher nicotine metabolite ratio was significantly associated with smoking more cigarettes per day among HIV-positive smokers, replicating the well-established NMR-smoking rate relationship in the gen
Effect: decline; r = .30, p = .001 (univariate); b = 0.188, p = 0.050 (multivariate)
None
declineHigher nicotine metabolite ratio was significantly associated with smoking more cigarettes per day among HIV-positive smokers, replicating the well-established NMR-smoking rate relationship in the gen
Effect: decline; r = .30, p = .001 (univariate); b = 0.188, p = 0.050 (multivariate)
None
declineHigher nicotine metabolite ratio was significantly associated with smoking more cigarettes per day among HIV-positive smokers, replicating the well-established NMR-smoking rate relationship in the gen
Effect: decline; r = .30, p = .001 (univariate); b = 0.188, p = 0.050 (multivariate)
None
declineHigher nicotine metabolite ratio was significantly associated with smoking more cigarettes per day among HIV-positive smokers, replicating the well-established NMR-smoking rate relationship in the gen
Effect: decline; r = .30, p = .001 (univariate); b = 0.188, p = 0.050 (multivariate)
None
declineHigher nicotine metabolite ratio was significantly associated with smoking more cigarettes per day among HIV-positive smokers, replicating the well-established NMR-smoking rate relationship in the gen
Effect: decline; r = .30, p = .001 (univariate); b = 0.188, p = 0.050 (multivariate)
None
declineHigher nicotine metabolite ratio was significantly associated with smoking more cigarettes per day among HIV-positive smokers, replicating the well-established NMR-smoking rate relationship in the gen
Effect: decline; r = .30, p = .001 (univariate); b = 0.188, p = 0.050 (multivariate)
None
declineHigher nicotine metabolite ratio was significantly associated with smoking more cigarettes per day among HIV-positive smokers, replicating the well-established NMR-smoking rate relationship in the gen
Effect: decline; r = .30, p = .001 (univariate); b = 0.188, p = 0.050 (multivariate)
None
declineHigher nicotine metabolite ratio was significantly associated with smoking more cigarettes per day among HIV-positive smokers, replicating the well-established NMR-smoking rate relationship in the gen
Effect: decline; r = .30, p = .001 (univariate); b = 0.188, p = 0.050 (multivariate)
None
declineHigher nicotine metabolite ratio was significantly associated with smoking more cigarettes per day among HIV-positive smokers, replicating the well-established NMR-smoking rate relationship in the gen
Effect: decline; r = .30, p = .001 (univariate); b = 0.188, p = 0.050 (multivariate)
None
declineHigher nicotine metabolite ratio was significantly associated with smoking more cigarettes per day among HIV-positive smokers, replicating the well-established NMR-smoking rate relationship in the gen
Effect: decline; r = .30, p = .001 (univariate); b = 0.188, p = 0.050 (multivariate)
None
declineHigher nicotine metabolite ratio was significantly associated with smoking more cigarettes per day among HIV-positive smokers, replicating the well-established NMR-smoking rate relationship in the gen
Effect: decline; r = .30, p = .001 (univariate); b = 0.188, p = 0.050 (multivariate)
None
declineHigher nicotine metabolite ratio was significantly associated with smoking more cigarettes per day among HIV-positive smokers, replicating the well-established NMR-smoking rate relationship in the gen
Effect: decline; r = .30, p = .001 (univariate); b = 0.188, p = 0.050 (multivariate)
None
declineHigher nicotine metabolite ratio was significantly associated with smoking more cigarettes per day among HIV-positive smokers, replicating the well-established NMR-smoking rate relationship in the gen
Effect: decline; r = .30, p = .001 (univariate); b = 0.188, p = 0.050 (multivariate)
None
declineHigher nicotine metabolite ratio was significantly associated with smoking more cigarettes per day among HIV-positive smokers, replicating the well-established NMR-smoking rate relationship in the gen
Effect: decline; r = .30, p = .001 (univariate); b = 0.188, p = 0.050 (multivariate)
None
declineHigher nicotine metabolite ratio was significantly associated with smoking more cigarettes per day among HIV-positive smokers, replicating the well-established NMR-smoking rate relationship in the gen
Effect: decline; r = .30, p = .001 (univariate); b = 0.188, p = 0.050 (multivariate)
None
declineHigher nicotine metabolite ratio was significantly associated with smoking more cigarettes per day among HIV-positive smokers, replicating the well-established NMR-smoking rate relationship in the gen
Effect: decline; r = .30, p = .001 (univariate); b = 0.188, p = 0.050 (multivariate)
None
declineHigher nicotine metabolite ratio was significantly associated with smoking more cigarettes per day among HIV-positive smokers, replicating the well-established NMR-smoking rate relationship in the gen
Effect: decline; r = .30, p = .001 (univariate); b = 0.188, p = 0.050 (multivariate)
None
declineHigher nicotine metabolite ratio was significantly associated with smoking more cigarettes per day among HIV-positive smokers, replicating the well-established NMR-smoking rate relationship in the gen
Effect: decline; r = .30, p = .001 (univariate); b = 0.188, p = 0.050 (multivariate)
None
declineHigher nicotine metabolite ratio was significantly associated with smoking more cigarettes per day among HIV-positive smokers, replicating the well-established NMR-smoking rate relationship in the gen
Effect: decline; r = .30, p = .001 (univariate); b = 0.188, p = 0.050 (multivariate)
None
declineHigher nicotine metabolite ratio was significantly associated with smoking more cigarettes per day among HIV-positive smokers, replicating the well-established NMR-smoking rate relationship in the gen
Effect: decline; r = .30, p = .001 (univariate); b = 0.188, p = 0.050 (multivariate)
None
declineHigher nicotine metabolite ratio was significantly associated with smoking more cigarettes per day among HIV-positive smokers, replicating the well-established NMR-smoking rate relationship in the gen
Effect: decline; r = .30, p = .001 (univariate); b = 0.188, p = 0.050 (multivariate)
None
declineHigher nicotine metabolite ratio was significantly associated with smoking more cigarettes per day among HIV-positive smokers, replicating the well-established NMR-smoking rate relationship in the gen
Effect: decline; r = .30, p = .001 (univariate); b = 0.188, p = 0.050 (multivariate)
None
declineHIV-positive smokers taking efavirenz had significantly faster nicotine metabolism (higher NMR) than those not taking efavirenz in a multiple regression model, with efavirenz alone accounting for 5% u
Effect: decline; b = 0.221, p = .010
None
declineHIV-positive smokers taking efavirenz had significantly faster nicotine metabolism (higher NMR) than those not taking efavirenz in a multiple regression model, with efavirenz alone accounting for 5% u
Effect: decline; b = 0.221, p = .010
None
declineHIV-positive smokers taking efavirenz had significantly faster nicotine metabolism (higher NMR) than those not taking efavirenz in a multiple regression model, with efavirenz alone accounting for 5% u
Effect: decline; b = 0.221, p = .010
None
declineHIV-positive smokers taking efavirenz had significantly faster nicotine metabolism (higher NMR) than those not taking efavirenz in a multiple regression model, with efavirenz alone accounting for 5% u
Effect: decline; b = 0.221, p = .010
None
declineHIV-positive smokers taking efavirenz had significantly faster nicotine metabolism (higher NMR) than those not taking efavirenz in a multiple regression model, with efavirenz alone accounting for 5% u
Effect: decline; b = 0.221, p = .010
None
declineHIV-positive smokers taking efavirenz had significantly faster nicotine metabolism (higher NMR) than those not taking efavirenz in a multiple regression model, with efavirenz alone accounting for 5% u
Effect: decline; b = 0.221, p = .010
None
declineHIV-positive smokers taking efavirenz had significantly faster nicotine metabolism (higher NMR) than those not taking efavirenz in a multiple regression model, with efavirenz alone accounting for 5% u
Effect: decline; b = 0.221, p = .010
None
declineHIV-positive smokers taking efavirenz had significantly faster nicotine metabolism (higher NMR) than those not taking efavirenz in a multiple regression model, with efavirenz alone accounting for 5% u
Effect: decline; b = 0.221, p = .010
None
declineHIV-positive smokers taking efavirenz had significantly faster nicotine metabolism (higher NMR) than those not taking efavirenz in a multiple regression model, with efavirenz alone accounting for 5% u
Effect: decline; b = 0.221, p = .010
None
declineHIV-positive smokers taking efavirenz had significantly faster nicotine metabolism (higher NMR) than those not taking efavirenz in a multiple regression model, with efavirenz alone accounting for 5% u
Effect: decline; b = 0.221, p = .010
None
declineHIV-positive smokers taking efavirenz had significantly faster nicotine metabolism (higher NMR) than those not taking efavirenz in a multiple regression model, with efavirenz alone accounting for 5% u
Effect: decline; b = 0.221, p = .010
None
declineHIV-positive smokers taking efavirenz had significantly faster nicotine metabolism (higher NMR) than those not taking efavirenz in a multiple regression model, with efavirenz alone accounting for 5% u
Effect: decline; b = 0.221, p = .010
None
declineHIV-positive smokers taking efavirenz had significantly faster nicotine metabolism (higher NMR) than those not taking efavirenz in a multiple regression model, with efavirenz alone accounting for 5% u
Effect: decline; b = 0.221, p = .010
None
declineHIV-positive smokers taking efavirenz had significantly faster nicotine metabolism (higher NMR) than those not taking efavirenz in a multiple regression model, with efavirenz alone accounting for 5% u
Effect: decline; b = 0.221, p = .010
None
declineHIV-positive smokers taking efavirenz had significantly faster nicotine metabolism (higher NMR) than those not taking efavirenz in a multiple regression model, with efavirenz alone accounting for 5% u
Effect: decline; b = 0.221, p = .010
None
declineHIV-positive smokers taking efavirenz had significantly faster nicotine metabolism (higher NMR) than those not taking efavirenz in a multiple regression model, with efavirenz alone accounting for 5% u
Effect: decline; b = 0.221, p = .010
None
declineHIV-positive smokers taking efavirenz had significantly faster nicotine metabolism (higher NMR) than those not taking efavirenz in a multiple regression model, with efavirenz alone accounting for 5% u
Effect: decline; b = 0.221, p = .010
None
declineHIV-positive smokers taking efavirenz had significantly faster nicotine metabolism (higher NMR) than those not taking efavirenz in a multiple regression model, with efavirenz alone accounting for 5% u
Effect: decline; b = 0.221, p = .010
None
declineHIV-positive smokers taking efavirenz had significantly faster nicotine metabolism (higher NMR) than those not taking efavirenz in a multiple regression model, with efavirenz alone accounting for 5% u
Effect: decline; b = 0.221, p = .010
None
declineHIV-positive smokers taking efavirenz had significantly faster nicotine metabolism (higher NMR) than those not taking efavirenz in a multiple regression model, with efavirenz alone accounting for 5% u
Effect: decline; b = 0.221, p = .010
None
declineHIV-positive smokers taking efavirenz had significantly faster nicotine metabolism (higher NMR) than those not taking efavirenz in a multiple regression model, with efavirenz alone accounting for 5% u
Effect: decline; b = 0.221, p = .010
None
declineHIV-positive smokers taking efavirenz had significantly faster nicotine metabolism (higher NMR) than those not taking efavirenz in a multiple regression model, with efavirenz alone accounting for 5% u
Effect: decline; b = 0.221, p = .010
None
declineHIV-positive smokers taking efavirenz had significantly faster nicotine metabolism (higher NMR) than those not taking efavirenz in a multiple regression model, with efavirenz alone accounting for 5% u
Effect: decline; b = 0.221, p = .010