parent-youth relationship quality

The FCU intervention predicted a significantly less severe decline in parent-youth relationship quality from ages 12-15, with intervention families maintaining better relationship trajectories than co

Effect: improvement; β = .16

The FCU intervention predicted a significantly less severe decline in parent-youth relationship quality from ages 12-15, with intervention families maintaining better relationship trajectories than co

Effect: improvement; β = .16

The FCU intervention predicted a significantly less severe decline in parent-youth relationship quality from ages 12-15, with intervention families maintaining better relationship trajectories than co

Effect: improvement; β = .16

The FCU intervention predicted a significantly less severe decline in parent-youth relationship quality from ages 12-15, with intervention families maintaining better relationship trajectories than co

Effect: improvement; β = .16

The FCU intervention predicted a significantly less severe decline in parent-youth relationship quality from ages 12-15, with intervention families maintaining better relationship trajectories than co

Effect: improvement; β = .16

The FCU intervention predicted a significantly less severe decline in parent-youth relationship quality from ages 12-15, with intervention families maintaining better relationship trajectories than co

Effect: improvement; β = .16

The FCU intervention predicted a significantly less severe decline in parent-youth relationship quality from ages 12-15, with intervention families maintaining better relationship trajectories than co

Effect: improvement; β = .16

The FCU intervention predicted a significantly less severe decline in parent-youth relationship quality from ages 12-15, with intervention families maintaining better relationship trajectories than co

Effect: improvement; β = .16

The FCU intervention predicted a significantly less severe decline in parent-youth relationship quality from ages 12-15, with intervention families maintaining better relationship trajectories than co

Effect: improvement; β = .16

The FCU intervention predicted a significantly less severe decline in parent-youth relationship quality from ages 12-15, with intervention families maintaining better relationship trajectories than co

Effect: improvement; β = .16

The FCU intervention predicted a significantly less severe decline in parent-youth relationship quality from ages 12-15, with intervention families maintaining better relationship trajectories than co

Effect: improvement; β = .16

The FCU intervention predicted a significantly less severe decline in parent-youth relationship quality from ages 12-15, with intervention families maintaining better relationship trajectories than co

Effect: improvement; β = .16

The FCU intervention predicted a significantly less severe decline in parent-youth relationship quality from ages 12-15, with intervention families maintaining better relationship trajectories than co

Effect: improvement; β = .16

The FCU intervention predicted a significantly less severe decline in parent-youth relationship quality from ages 12-15, with intervention families maintaining better relationship trajectories than co

Effect: improvement; β = .16

The FCU intervention predicted a significantly less severe decline in parent-youth relationship quality from ages 12-15, with intervention families maintaining better relationship trajectories than co

Effect: improvement; β = .16

The FCU intervention predicted a significantly less severe decline in parent-youth relationship quality from ages 12-15, with intervention families maintaining better relationship trajectories than co

Effect: improvement; β = .16

The FCU intervention predicted a significantly less severe decline in parent-youth relationship quality from ages 12-15, with intervention families maintaining better relationship trajectories than co

Effect: improvement; β = .16

The FCU intervention predicted a significantly less severe decline in parent-youth relationship quality from ages 12-15, with intervention families maintaining better relationship trajectories than co

Effect: improvement; β = .16

The FCU intervention predicted a significantly less severe decline in parent-youth relationship quality from ages 12-15, with intervention families maintaining better relationship trajectories than co

Effect: improvement; β = .16

The FCU intervention predicted a significantly less severe decline in parent-youth relationship quality from ages 12-15, with intervention families maintaining better relationship trajectories than co

Effect: improvement; β = .16

The FCU intervention predicted a significantly less severe decline in parent-youth relationship quality from ages 12-15, with intervention families maintaining better relationship trajectories than co

Effect: improvement; β = .16

The FCU intervention predicted a significantly less severe decline in parent-youth relationship quality from ages 12-15, with intervention families maintaining better relationship trajectories than co

Effect: improvement; β = .16

The FCU intervention predicted a significantly less severe decline in parent-youth relationship quality from ages 12-15, with intervention families maintaining better relationship trajectories than co

Effect: improvement; β = .16

The FCU intervention predicted a significantly less severe decline in parent-youth relationship quality from ages 12-15, with intervention families maintaining better relationship trajectories than co

Effect: improvement; β = .16

The FCU intervention predicted a significantly less severe decline in parent-youth relationship quality from ages 12-15, with intervention families maintaining better relationship trajectories than co

Effect: improvement; β = .16

The FCU intervention predicted a significantly less severe decline in parent-youth relationship quality from ages 12-15, with intervention families maintaining better relationship trajectories than co

Effect: improvement; β = .16

The FCU intervention predicted a significantly less severe decline in parent-youth relationship quality from ages 12-15, with intervention families maintaining better relationship trajectories than co

Effect: improvement; β = .16