overall survival
Related entities
Findings (50)
None
declinePatients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease
Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
declinePatients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease
Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
declinePatients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease
Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
declinePatients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease
Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
declinePatients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease
Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
declinePatients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease
Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
declinePatients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease
Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
declinePatients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease
Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
declinePatients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease
Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
declinePatients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease
Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
declinePatients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease
Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
declinePatients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease
Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
declinePatients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease
Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
declinePatients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease
Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
declinePatients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease
Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
declinePatients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease
Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
declinePatients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease
Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
declinePatients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease
Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
declinePatients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease
Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
declinePatients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease
Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
declinePatients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease
Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
declinePatients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease
Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
declinePatients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease
Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
declinePatients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease
Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
declinePatients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease
Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
declinePatients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease
Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
declinePatients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease
Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
declinePediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ
Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%
None
declinePediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ
Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%
None
declinePediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ
Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%
None
declinePediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ
Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%
None
declinePediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ
Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%
None
declinePediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ
Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%
None
declinePediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ
Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%
None
declinePediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ
Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%
None
declinePediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ
Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%
None
declinePediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ
Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%
None
declinePediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ
Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%
None
declinePediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ
Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%
None
declinePediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ
Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%
None
declinePediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ
Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%
None
declinePediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ
Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%
None
declinePediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ
Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%
None
declinePediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ
Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%
None
declinePediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ
Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%
None
declinePediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ
Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%
None
declinePediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ
Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%
None
declinePediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ
Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%
None
declinePediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ
Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%
None
declinePediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ
Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%