ExploreOutcomeoverall survival
Outcome

overall survival

Also known as: 3-year overall survival overall survival overall survival and complete remission duration overall survival stratified by MRD status OS CRD CR
24 findings 3 papers 16 related entities View in graph →

Related entities

interventions
conditions
populations
studys

Findings (50)

None
decline

Patients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease

Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97

Size: HR 3.73 CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
decline

Patients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease

Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97

Size: HR 3.73 CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
decline

Patients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease

Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97

Size: HR 3.73 CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
decline

Patients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease

Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97

Size: HR 3.73 CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
decline

Patients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease

Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97

Size: HR 3.73 CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
decline

Patients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease

Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97

Size: HR 3.73 CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
decline

Patients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease

Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97

Size: HR 3.73 CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
decline

Patients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease

Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97

Size: HR 3.73 CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
decline

Patients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease

Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97

Size: HR 3.73 CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
decline

Patients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease

Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97

Size: HR 3.73 CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
decline

Patients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease

Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97

Size: HR 3.73 CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
decline

Patients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease

Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97

Size: HR 3.73 CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
decline

Patients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease

Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97

Size: HR 3.73 CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
decline

Patients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease

Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97

Size: HR 3.73 CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
decline

Patients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease

Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97

Size: HR 3.73 CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
decline

Patients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease

Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97

Size: HR 3.73 CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
decline

Patients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease

Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97

Size: HR 3.73 CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
decline

Patients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease

Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97

Size: HR 3.73 CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
decline

Patients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease

Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97

Size: HR 3.73 CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
decline

Patients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease

Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97

Size: HR 3.73 CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
decline

Patients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease

Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97

Size: HR 3.73 CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
decline

Patients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease

Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97

Size: HR 3.73 CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
decline

Patients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease

Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97

Size: HR 3.73 CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
decline

Patients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease

Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97

Size: HR 3.73 CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
decline

Patients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease

Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97

Size: HR 3.73 CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
decline

Patients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease

Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97

Size: HR 3.73 CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
decline

Patients who received >=2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had significantly lower overall survival compared to those who received 1 cycle (HR 3.73, 95% CI: 1.39-9.97, p=0.006), with death from disease

Effect: decline; HR 3.73; CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97

Size: HR 3.73 CI: 95% CI: 1.39-9.97
None
decline

Pediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ

Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%

Size: 81% vs. 28%
None
decline

Pediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ

Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%

Size: 81% vs. 28%
None
decline

Pediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ

Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%

Size: 81% vs. 28%
None
decline

Pediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ

Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%

Size: 81% vs. 28%
None
decline

Pediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ

Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%

Size: 81% vs. 28%
None
decline

Pediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ

Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%

Size: 81% vs. 28%
None
decline

Pediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ

Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%

Size: 81% vs. 28%
None
decline

Pediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ

Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%

Size: 81% vs. 28%
None
decline

Pediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ

Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%

Size: 81% vs. 28%
None
decline

Pediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ

Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%

Size: 81% vs. 28%
None
decline

Pediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ

Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%

Size: 81% vs. 28%
None
decline

Pediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ

Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%

Size: 81% vs. 28%
None
decline

Pediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ

Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%

Size: 81% vs. 28%
None
decline

Pediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ

Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%

Size: 81% vs. 28%
None
decline

Pediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ

Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%

Size: 81% vs. 28%
None
decline

Pediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ

Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%

Size: 81% vs. 28%
None
decline

Pediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ

Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%

Size: 81% vs. 28%
None
decline

Pediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ

Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%

Size: 81% vs. 28%
None
decline

Pediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ

Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%

Size: 81% vs. 28%
None
decline

Pediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ

Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%

Size: 81% vs. 28%
None
decline

Pediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ

Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%

Size: 81% vs. 28%
None
decline

Pediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ

Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%

Size: 81% vs. 28%
None
decline

Pediatric patients with CNS leukemia had significantly better 3-year overall survival compared to adult patients, though the likelihood of achieving CNS complete remission was not significantly differ

Effect: decline; 81% vs. 28%

Size: 81% vs. 28%

Papers (3)