Statin therapy
Related entities
Findings (27)
None
declineCommercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for statins compared to non-IDD patients (47.9% vs 58.7%), r
Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.73; CI: 95% CI = 0.67-0.8
None
declineCommercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for statins compared to non-IDD patients (47.9% vs 58.7%), r
Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.73; CI: 95% CI = 0.67-0.8
None
declineCommercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for statins compared to non-IDD patients (47.9% vs 58.7%), r
Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.73; CI: 95% CI = 0.67-0.8
None
declineCommercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for statins compared to non-IDD patients (47.9% vs 58.7%), r
Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.73; CI: 95% CI = 0.67-0.8
None
declineCommercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for statins compared to non-IDD patients (47.9% vs 58.7%), r
Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.73; CI: 95% CI = 0.67-0.8
None
declineCommercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for statins compared to non-IDD patients (47.9% vs 58.7%), r
Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.73; CI: 95% CI = 0.67-0.8
None
declineCommercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for statins compared to non-IDD patients (47.9% vs 58.7%), r
Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.73; CI: 95% CI = 0.67-0.8
None
declineCommercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for statins compared to non-IDD patients (47.9% vs 58.7%), r
Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.73; CI: 95% CI = 0.67-0.8
None
declineCommercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for statins compared to non-IDD patients (47.9% vs 58.7%), r
Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.73; CI: 95% CI = 0.67-0.8
None
declineCommercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for statins compared to non-IDD patients (47.9% vs 58.7%), r
Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.73; CI: 95% CI = 0.67-0.8
None
declineCommercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for statins compared to non-IDD patients (47.9% vs 58.7%), r
Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.73; CI: 95% CI = 0.67-0.8
None
declineCommercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for statins compared to non-IDD patients (47.9% vs 58.7%), r
Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.73; CI: 95% CI = 0.67-0.8
None
declineCommercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for statins compared to non-IDD patients (47.9% vs 58.7%), r
Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.73; CI: 95% CI = 0.67-0.8
None
declineCommercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for statins compared to non-IDD patients (47.9% vs 58.7%), r
Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.73; CI: 95% CI = 0.67-0.8
None
declineCommercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for statins compared to non-IDD patients (47.9% vs 58.7%), r
Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.73; CI: 95% CI = 0.67-0.8
None
declineCommercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for statins compared to non-IDD patients (47.9% vs 58.7%), r
Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.73; CI: 95% CI = 0.67-0.8
None
declineCommercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for statins compared to non-IDD patients (47.9% vs 58.7%), r
Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.73; CI: 95% CI = 0.67-0.8
None
declineCommercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for statins compared to non-IDD patients (47.9% vs 58.7%), r
Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.73; CI: 95% CI = 0.67-0.8
None
declineCommercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for statins compared to non-IDD patients (47.9% vs 58.7%), r
Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.73; CI: 95% CI = 0.67-0.8
None
declineCommercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for statins compared to non-IDD patients (47.9% vs 58.7%), r
Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.73; CI: 95% CI = 0.67-0.8
None
declineCommercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for statins compared to non-IDD patients (47.9% vs 58.7%), r
Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.73; CI: 95% CI = 0.67-0.8
None
declineCommercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for statins compared to non-IDD patients (47.9% vs 58.7%), r
Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.73; CI: 95% CI = 0.67-0.8
None
declineCommercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for statins compared to non-IDD patients (47.9% vs 58.7%), r
Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.73; CI: 95% CI = 0.67-0.8
None
declineCommercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for statins compared to non-IDD patients (47.9% vs 58.7%), r
Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.73; CI: 95% CI = 0.67-0.8
None
declineCommercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for statins compared to non-IDD patients (47.9% vs 58.7%), r
Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.73; CI: 95% CI = 0.67-0.8
None
declineCommercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for statins compared to non-IDD patients (47.9% vs 58.7%), r
Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.73; CI: 95% CI = 0.67-0.8
None
declineCommercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for statins compared to non-IDD patients (47.9% vs 58.7%), r
Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.73; CI: 95% CI = 0.67-0.8