ExploreOutcomeRejection prevention
Outcome

Rejection prevention

Also known as: Rejection prevention and subclinical rejection on surveillance biopsy
3 findings 1 paper 3 related entities View in graph →

Related entities

interventions
conditions
studys

Findings (27)

None
null

Donor bone marrow infusion did not significantly improve rejection prevention when added to the belatacept-sirolimus regimen, with all three episodes of subclinical rejection occurring in patients who

Effect: null; P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)

Size: P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)
None
null

Donor bone marrow infusion did not significantly improve rejection prevention when added to the belatacept-sirolimus regimen, with all three episodes of subclinical rejection occurring in patients who

Effect: null; P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)

Size: P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)
None
null

Donor bone marrow infusion did not significantly improve rejection prevention when added to the belatacept-sirolimus regimen, with all three episodes of subclinical rejection occurring in patients who

Effect: null; P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)

Size: P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)
None
null

Donor bone marrow infusion did not significantly improve rejection prevention when added to the belatacept-sirolimus regimen, with all three episodes of subclinical rejection occurring in patients who

Effect: null; P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)

Size: P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)
None
null

Donor bone marrow infusion did not significantly improve rejection prevention when added to the belatacept-sirolimus regimen, with all three episodes of subclinical rejection occurring in patients who

Effect: null; P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)

Size: P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)
None
null

Donor bone marrow infusion did not significantly improve rejection prevention when added to the belatacept-sirolimus regimen, with all three episodes of subclinical rejection occurring in patients who

Effect: null; P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)

Size: P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)
None
null

Donor bone marrow infusion did not significantly improve rejection prevention when added to the belatacept-sirolimus regimen, with all three episodes of subclinical rejection occurring in patients who

Effect: null; P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)

Size: P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)
None
null

Donor bone marrow infusion did not significantly improve rejection prevention when added to the belatacept-sirolimus regimen, with all three episodes of subclinical rejection occurring in patients who

Effect: null; P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)

Size: P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)
None
null

Donor bone marrow infusion did not significantly improve rejection prevention when added to the belatacept-sirolimus regimen, with all three episodes of subclinical rejection occurring in patients who

Effect: null; P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)

Size: P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)
None
null

Donor bone marrow infusion did not significantly improve rejection prevention when added to the belatacept-sirolimus regimen, with all three episodes of subclinical rejection occurring in patients who

Effect: null; P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)

Size: P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)
None
null

Donor bone marrow infusion did not significantly improve rejection prevention when added to the belatacept-sirolimus regimen, with all three episodes of subclinical rejection occurring in patients who

Effect: null; P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)

Size: P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)
None
null

Donor bone marrow infusion did not significantly improve rejection prevention when added to the belatacept-sirolimus regimen, with all three episodes of subclinical rejection occurring in patients who

Effect: null; P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)

Size: P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)
None
null

Donor bone marrow infusion did not significantly improve rejection prevention when added to the belatacept-sirolimus regimen, with all three episodes of subclinical rejection occurring in patients who

Effect: null; P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)

Size: P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)
None
null

Donor bone marrow infusion did not significantly improve rejection prevention when added to the belatacept-sirolimus regimen, with all three episodes of subclinical rejection occurring in patients who

Effect: null; P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)

Size: P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)
None
null

Donor bone marrow infusion did not significantly improve rejection prevention when added to the belatacept-sirolimus regimen, with all three episodes of subclinical rejection occurring in patients who

Effect: null; P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)

Size: P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)
None
null

Donor bone marrow infusion did not significantly improve rejection prevention when added to the belatacept-sirolimus regimen, with all three episodes of subclinical rejection occurring in patients who

Effect: null; P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)

Size: P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)
None
null

Donor bone marrow infusion did not significantly improve rejection prevention when added to the belatacept-sirolimus regimen, with all three episodes of subclinical rejection occurring in patients who

Effect: null; P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)

Size: P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)
None
null

Donor bone marrow infusion did not significantly improve rejection prevention when added to the belatacept-sirolimus regimen, with all three episodes of subclinical rejection occurring in patients who

Effect: null; P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)

Size: P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)
None
null

Donor bone marrow infusion did not significantly improve rejection prevention when added to the belatacept-sirolimus regimen, with all three episodes of subclinical rejection occurring in patients who

Effect: null; P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)

Size: P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)
None
null

Donor bone marrow infusion did not significantly improve rejection prevention when added to the belatacept-sirolimus regimen, with all three episodes of subclinical rejection occurring in patients who

Effect: null; P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)

Size: P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)
None
null

Donor bone marrow infusion did not significantly improve rejection prevention when added to the belatacept-sirolimus regimen, with all three episodes of subclinical rejection occurring in patients who

Effect: null; P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)

Size: P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)
None
null

Donor bone marrow infusion did not significantly improve rejection prevention when added to the belatacept-sirolimus regimen, with all three episodes of subclinical rejection occurring in patients who

Effect: null; P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)

Size: P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)
None
null

Donor bone marrow infusion did not significantly improve rejection prevention when added to the belatacept-sirolimus regimen, with all three episodes of subclinical rejection occurring in patients who

Effect: null; P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)

Size: P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)
None
null

Donor bone marrow infusion did not significantly improve rejection prevention when added to the belatacept-sirolimus regimen, with all three episodes of subclinical rejection occurring in patients who

Effect: null; P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)

Size: P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)
None
null

Donor bone marrow infusion did not significantly improve rejection prevention when added to the belatacept-sirolimus regimen, with all three episodes of subclinical rejection occurring in patients who

Effect: null; P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)

Size: P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)
None
null

Donor bone marrow infusion did not significantly improve rejection prevention when added to the belatacept-sirolimus regimen, with all three episodes of subclinical rejection occurring in patients who

Effect: null; P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)

Size: P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)
None
null

Donor bone marrow infusion did not significantly improve rejection prevention when added to the belatacept-sirolimus regimen, with all three episodes of subclinical rejection occurring in patients who

Effect: null; P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)

Size: P=0.22 (Fisher's exact test)

Papers (1)