Physical limitation

CABG provided greater improvement in physical limitation scores than DES-PCI between 12 and 36 months, with the largest difference of 4.4 points at 24 months (p<0.001). DES-PCI provided faster early r

Effect: improvement; 4.4 points (CABG-PCI difference at 24 months); CI: 95% CI 2.7 to 6.1

CABG provided greater improvement in physical limitation scores than DES-PCI between 12 and 36 months, with the largest difference of 4.4 points at 24 months (p<0.001). DES-PCI provided faster early r

Effect: improvement; 4.4 points (CABG-PCI difference at 24 months); CI: 95% CI 2.7 to 6.1

CABG provided greater improvement in physical limitation scores than DES-PCI between 12 and 36 months, with the largest difference of 4.4 points at 24 months (p<0.001). DES-PCI provided faster early r

Effect: improvement; 4.4 points (CABG-PCI difference at 24 months); CI: 95% CI 2.7 to 6.1

CABG provided greater improvement in physical limitation scores than DES-PCI between 12 and 36 months, with the largest difference of 4.4 points at 24 months (p<0.001). DES-PCI provided faster early r

Effect: improvement; 4.4 points (CABG-PCI difference at 24 months); CI: 95% CI 2.7 to 6.1

CABG provided greater improvement in physical limitation scores than DES-PCI between 12 and 36 months, with the largest difference of 4.4 points at 24 months (p<0.001). DES-PCI provided faster early r

Effect: improvement; 4.4 points (CABG-PCI difference at 24 months); CI: 95% CI 2.7 to 6.1

CABG provided greater improvement in physical limitation scores than DES-PCI between 12 and 36 months, with the largest difference of 4.4 points at 24 months (p<0.001). DES-PCI provided faster early r

Effect: improvement; 4.4 points (CABG-PCI difference at 24 months); CI: 95% CI 2.7 to 6.1

CABG provided greater improvement in physical limitation scores than DES-PCI between 12 and 36 months, with the largest difference of 4.4 points at 24 months (p<0.001). DES-PCI provided faster early r

Effect: improvement; 4.4 points (CABG-PCI difference at 24 months); CI: 95% CI 2.7 to 6.1

CABG provided greater improvement in physical limitation scores than DES-PCI between 12 and 36 months, with the largest difference of 4.4 points at 24 months (p<0.001). DES-PCI provided faster early r

Effect: improvement; 4.4 points (CABG-PCI difference at 24 months); CI: 95% CI 2.7 to 6.1

CABG provided greater improvement in physical limitation scores than DES-PCI between 12 and 36 months, with the largest difference of 4.4 points at 24 months (p<0.001). DES-PCI provided faster early r

Effect: improvement; 4.4 points (CABG-PCI difference at 24 months); CI: 95% CI 2.7 to 6.1

CABG provided greater improvement in physical limitation scores than DES-PCI between 12 and 36 months, with the largest difference of 4.4 points at 24 months (p<0.001). DES-PCI provided faster early r

Effect: improvement; 4.4 points (CABG-PCI difference at 24 months); CI: 95% CI 2.7 to 6.1

CABG provided greater improvement in physical limitation scores than DES-PCI between 12 and 36 months, with the largest difference of 4.4 points at 24 months (p<0.001). DES-PCI provided faster early r

Effect: improvement; 4.4 points (CABG-PCI difference at 24 months); CI: 95% CI 2.7 to 6.1

CABG provided greater improvement in physical limitation scores than DES-PCI between 12 and 36 months, with the largest difference of 4.4 points at 24 months (p<0.001). DES-PCI provided faster early r

Effect: improvement; 4.4 points (CABG-PCI difference at 24 months); CI: 95% CI 2.7 to 6.1

CABG provided greater improvement in physical limitation scores than DES-PCI between 12 and 36 months, with the largest difference of 4.4 points at 24 months (p<0.001). DES-PCI provided faster early r

Effect: improvement; 4.4 points (CABG-PCI difference at 24 months); CI: 95% CI 2.7 to 6.1

CABG provided greater improvement in physical limitation scores than DES-PCI between 12 and 36 months, with the largest difference of 4.4 points at 24 months (p<0.001). DES-PCI provided faster early r

Effect: improvement; 4.4 points (CABG-PCI difference at 24 months); CI: 95% CI 2.7 to 6.1

CABG provided greater improvement in physical limitation scores than DES-PCI between 12 and 36 months, with the largest difference of 4.4 points at 24 months (p<0.001). DES-PCI provided faster early r

Effect: improvement; 4.4 points (CABG-PCI difference at 24 months); CI: 95% CI 2.7 to 6.1

CABG provided greater improvement in physical limitation scores than DES-PCI between 12 and 36 months, with the largest difference of 4.4 points at 24 months (p<0.001). DES-PCI provided faster early r

Effect: improvement; 4.4 points (CABG-PCI difference at 24 months); CI: 95% CI 2.7 to 6.1

CABG provided greater improvement in physical limitation scores than DES-PCI between 12 and 36 months, with the largest difference of 4.4 points at 24 months (p<0.001). DES-PCI provided faster early r

Effect: improvement; 4.4 points (CABG-PCI difference at 24 months); CI: 95% CI 2.7 to 6.1

CABG provided greater improvement in physical limitation scores than DES-PCI between 12 and 36 months, with the largest difference of 4.4 points at 24 months (p<0.001). DES-PCI provided faster early r

Effect: improvement; 4.4 points (CABG-PCI difference at 24 months); CI: 95% CI 2.7 to 6.1

CABG provided greater improvement in physical limitation scores than DES-PCI between 12 and 36 months, with the largest difference of 4.4 points at 24 months (p<0.001). DES-PCI provided faster early r

Effect: improvement; 4.4 points (CABG-PCI difference at 24 months); CI: 95% CI 2.7 to 6.1

CABG provided greater improvement in physical limitation scores than DES-PCI between 12 and 36 months, with the largest difference of 4.4 points at 24 months (p<0.001). DES-PCI provided faster early r

Effect: improvement; 4.4 points (CABG-PCI difference at 24 months); CI: 95% CI 2.7 to 6.1

CABG provided greater improvement in physical limitation scores than DES-PCI between 12 and 36 months, with the largest difference of 4.4 points at 24 months (p<0.001). DES-PCI provided faster early r

Effect: improvement; 4.4 points (CABG-PCI difference at 24 months); CI: 95% CI 2.7 to 6.1

CABG provided greater improvement in physical limitation scores than DES-PCI between 12 and 36 months, with the largest difference of 4.4 points at 24 months (p<0.001). DES-PCI provided faster early r

Effect: improvement; 4.4 points (CABG-PCI difference at 24 months); CI: 95% CI 2.7 to 6.1

CABG provided greater improvement in physical limitation scores than DES-PCI between 12 and 36 months, with the largest difference of 4.4 points at 24 months (p<0.001). DES-PCI provided faster early r

Effect: improvement; 4.4 points (CABG-PCI difference at 24 months); CI: 95% CI 2.7 to 6.1

CABG provided greater improvement in physical limitation scores than DES-PCI between 12 and 36 months, with the largest difference of 4.4 points at 24 months (p<0.001). DES-PCI provided faster early r

Effect: improvement; 4.4 points (CABG-PCI difference at 24 months); CI: 95% CI 2.7 to 6.1

CABG provided greater improvement in physical limitation scores than DES-PCI between 12 and 36 months, with the largest difference of 4.4 points at 24 months (p<0.001). DES-PCI provided faster early r

Effect: improvement; 4.4 points (CABG-PCI difference at 24 months); CI: 95% CI 2.7 to 6.1

CABG provided greater improvement in physical limitation scores than DES-PCI between 12 and 36 months, with the largest difference of 4.4 points at 24 months (p<0.001). DES-PCI provided faster early r

Effect: improvement; 4.4 points (CABG-PCI difference at 24 months); CI: 95% CI 2.7 to 6.1

CABG provided greater improvement in physical limitation scores than DES-PCI between 12 and 36 months, with the largest difference of 4.4 points at 24 months (p<0.001). DES-PCI provided faster early r

Effect: improvement; 4.4 points (CABG-PCI difference at 24 months); CI: 95% CI 2.7 to 6.1