Percent weight change from baseline at 1 year

Weekly minutes of physical activity completely mediated the relationship between social support for physical activity and weight change at 1 year; the indirect effect through PA was -0.85 (95% bootstr

Effect: improvement; Indirect effect = -0.85 (SE 0.31); CI: 95% Bootstrap CI [-1.56, -0.33]

Weekly minutes of physical activity completely mediated the relationship between social support for physical activity and weight change at 1 year; the indirect effect through PA was -0.85 (95% bootstr

Effect: improvement; Indirect effect = -0.85 (SE 0.31); CI: 95% Bootstrap CI [-1.56, -0.33]

Weekly minutes of physical activity completely mediated the relationship between social support for physical activity and weight change at 1 year; the indirect effect through PA was -0.85 (95% bootstr

Effect: improvement; Indirect effect = -0.85 (SE 0.31); CI: 95% Bootstrap CI [-1.56, -0.33]

Weekly minutes of physical activity completely mediated the relationship between social support for physical activity and weight change at 1 year; the indirect effect through PA was -0.85 (95% bootstr

Effect: improvement; Indirect effect = -0.85 (SE 0.31); CI: 95% Bootstrap CI [-1.56, -0.33]

Weekly minutes of physical activity completely mediated the relationship between social support for physical activity and weight change at 1 year; the indirect effect through PA was -0.85 (95% bootstr

Effect: improvement; Indirect effect = -0.85 (SE 0.31); CI: 95% Bootstrap CI [-1.56, -0.33]

Weekly minutes of physical activity completely mediated the relationship between social support for physical activity and weight change at 1 year; the indirect effect through PA was -0.85 (95% bootstr

Effect: improvement; Indirect effect = -0.85 (SE 0.31); CI: 95% Bootstrap CI [-1.56, -0.33]

Weekly minutes of physical activity completely mediated the relationship between social support for physical activity and weight change at 1 year; the indirect effect through PA was -0.85 (95% bootstr

Effect: improvement; Indirect effect = -0.85 (SE 0.31); CI: 95% Bootstrap CI [-1.56, -0.33]

Weekly minutes of physical activity completely mediated the relationship between social support for physical activity and weight change at 1 year; the indirect effect through PA was -0.85 (95% bootstr

Effect: improvement; Indirect effect = -0.85 (SE 0.31); CI: 95% Bootstrap CI [-1.56, -0.33]

Weekly minutes of physical activity completely mediated the relationship between social support for physical activity and weight change at 1 year; the indirect effect through PA was -0.85 (95% bootstr

Effect: improvement; Indirect effect = -0.85 (SE 0.31); CI: 95% Bootstrap CI [-1.56, -0.33]

Weekly minutes of physical activity completely mediated the relationship between social support for physical activity and weight change at 1 year; the indirect effect through PA was -0.85 (95% bootstr

Effect: improvement; Indirect effect = -0.85 (SE 0.31); CI: 95% Bootstrap CI [-1.56, -0.33]

Weekly minutes of physical activity completely mediated the relationship between social support for physical activity and weight change at 1 year; the indirect effect through PA was -0.85 (95% bootstr

Effect: improvement; Indirect effect = -0.85 (SE 0.31); CI: 95% Bootstrap CI [-1.56, -0.33]

Weekly minutes of physical activity completely mediated the relationship between social support for physical activity and weight change at 1 year; the indirect effect through PA was -0.85 (95% bootstr

Effect: improvement; Indirect effect = -0.85 (SE 0.31); CI: 95% Bootstrap CI [-1.56, -0.33]

Weekly minutes of physical activity completely mediated the relationship between social support for physical activity and weight change at 1 year; the indirect effect through PA was -0.85 (95% bootstr

Effect: improvement; Indirect effect = -0.85 (SE 0.31); CI: 95% Bootstrap CI [-1.56, -0.33]

Weekly minutes of physical activity completely mediated the relationship between social support for physical activity and weight change at 1 year; the indirect effect through PA was -0.85 (95% bootstr

Effect: improvement; Indirect effect = -0.85 (SE 0.31); CI: 95% Bootstrap CI [-1.56, -0.33]

Weekly minutes of physical activity completely mediated the relationship between social support for physical activity and weight change at 1 year; the indirect effect through PA was -0.85 (95% bootstr

Effect: improvement; Indirect effect = -0.85 (SE 0.31); CI: 95% Bootstrap CI [-1.56, -0.33]

Weekly minutes of physical activity completely mediated the relationship between social support for physical activity and weight change at 1 year; the indirect effect through PA was -0.85 (95% bootstr

Effect: improvement; Indirect effect = -0.85 (SE 0.31); CI: 95% Bootstrap CI [-1.56, -0.33]

Weekly minutes of physical activity completely mediated the relationship between social support for physical activity and weight change at 1 year; the indirect effect through PA was -0.85 (95% bootstr

Effect: improvement; Indirect effect = -0.85 (SE 0.31); CI: 95% Bootstrap CI [-1.56, -0.33]

Weekly minutes of physical activity completely mediated the relationship between social support for physical activity and weight change at 1 year; the indirect effect through PA was -0.85 (95% bootstr

Effect: improvement; Indirect effect = -0.85 (SE 0.31); CI: 95% Bootstrap CI [-1.56, -0.33]

Weekly minutes of physical activity completely mediated the relationship between social support for physical activity and weight change at 1 year; the indirect effect through PA was -0.85 (95% bootstr

Effect: improvement; Indirect effect = -0.85 (SE 0.31); CI: 95% Bootstrap CI [-1.56, -0.33]

Weekly minutes of physical activity completely mediated the relationship between social support for physical activity and weight change at 1 year; the indirect effect through PA was -0.85 (95% bootstr

Effect: improvement; Indirect effect = -0.85 (SE 0.31); CI: 95% Bootstrap CI [-1.56, -0.33]

Weekly minutes of physical activity completely mediated the relationship between social support for physical activity and weight change at 1 year; the indirect effect through PA was -0.85 (95% bootstr

Effect: improvement; Indirect effect = -0.85 (SE 0.31); CI: 95% Bootstrap CI [-1.56, -0.33]

Weekly minutes of physical activity completely mediated the relationship between social support for physical activity and weight change at 1 year; the indirect effect through PA was -0.85 (95% bootstr

Effect: improvement; Indirect effect = -0.85 (SE 0.31); CI: 95% Bootstrap CI [-1.56, -0.33]

Weekly minutes of physical activity completely mediated the relationship between social support for physical activity and weight change at 1 year; the indirect effect through PA was -0.85 (95% bootstr

Effect: improvement; Indirect effect = -0.85 (SE 0.31); CI: 95% Bootstrap CI [-1.56, -0.33]

Weekly minutes of physical activity completely mediated the relationship between social support for physical activity and weight change at 1 year; the indirect effect through PA was -0.85 (95% bootstr

Effect: improvement; Indirect effect = -0.85 (SE 0.31); CI: 95% Bootstrap CI [-1.56, -0.33]

Weekly minutes of physical activity completely mediated the relationship between social support for physical activity and weight change at 1 year; the indirect effect through PA was -0.85 (95% bootstr

Effect: improvement; Indirect effect = -0.85 (SE 0.31); CI: 95% Bootstrap CI [-1.56, -0.33]

Weekly minutes of physical activity completely mediated the relationship between social support for physical activity and weight change at 1 year; the indirect effect through PA was -0.85 (95% bootstr

Effect: improvement; Indirect effect = -0.85 (SE 0.31); CI: 95% Bootstrap CI [-1.56, -0.33]

Weekly minutes of physical activity completely mediated the relationship between social support for physical activity and weight change at 1 year; the indirect effect through PA was -0.85 (95% bootstr

Effect: improvement; Indirect effect = -0.85 (SE 0.31); CI: 95% Bootstrap CI [-1.56, -0.33]