Emotion Regulation

Sleep restriction caused significantly poorer parent-reported emotion regulation in adolescents with ADHD compared to sleep extension (d = 0.56), but did not significantly affect adolescent self-repor

Effect: decline; d = 0.56

Sleep restriction caused significantly poorer parent-reported emotion regulation in adolescents with ADHD compared to sleep extension (d = 0.56), but did not significantly affect adolescent self-repor

Effect: decline; d = 0.56

Sleep restriction caused significantly poorer parent-reported emotion regulation in adolescents with ADHD compared to sleep extension (d = 0.56), but did not significantly affect adolescent self-repor

Effect: decline; d = 0.56

Sleep restriction caused significantly poorer parent-reported emotion regulation in adolescents with ADHD compared to sleep extension (d = 0.56), but did not significantly affect adolescent self-repor

Effect: decline; d = 0.56

Sleep restriction caused significantly poorer parent-reported emotion regulation in adolescents with ADHD compared to sleep extension (d = 0.56), but did not significantly affect adolescent self-repor

Effect: decline; d = 0.56

Sleep restriction caused significantly poorer parent-reported emotion regulation in adolescents with ADHD compared to sleep extension (d = 0.56), but did not significantly affect adolescent self-repor

Effect: decline; d = 0.56

Sleep restriction caused significantly poorer parent-reported emotion regulation in adolescents with ADHD compared to sleep extension (d = 0.56), but did not significantly affect adolescent self-repor

Effect: decline; d = 0.56

Sleep restriction caused significantly poorer parent-reported emotion regulation in adolescents with ADHD compared to sleep extension (d = 0.56), but did not significantly affect adolescent self-repor

Effect: decline; d = 0.56

Sleep restriction caused significantly poorer parent-reported emotion regulation in adolescents with ADHD compared to sleep extension (d = 0.56), but did not significantly affect adolescent self-repor

Effect: decline; d = 0.56

Sleep restriction caused significantly poorer parent-reported emotion regulation in adolescents with ADHD compared to sleep extension (d = 0.56), but did not significantly affect adolescent self-repor

Effect: decline; d = 0.56

Sleep restriction caused significantly poorer parent-reported emotion regulation in adolescents with ADHD compared to sleep extension (d = 0.56), but did not significantly affect adolescent self-repor

Effect: decline; d = 0.56

Sleep restriction caused significantly poorer parent-reported emotion regulation in adolescents with ADHD compared to sleep extension (d = 0.56), but did not significantly affect adolescent self-repor

Effect: decline; d = 0.56

Sleep restriction caused significantly poorer parent-reported emotion regulation in adolescents with ADHD compared to sleep extension (d = 0.56), but did not significantly affect adolescent self-repor

Effect: decline; d = 0.56

Sleep restriction caused significantly poorer parent-reported emotion regulation in adolescents with ADHD compared to sleep extension (d = 0.56), but did not significantly affect adolescent self-repor

Effect: decline; d = 0.56

Sleep restriction caused significantly poorer parent-reported emotion regulation in adolescents with ADHD compared to sleep extension (d = 0.56), but did not significantly affect adolescent self-repor

Effect: decline; d = 0.56

Sleep restriction caused significantly poorer parent-reported emotion regulation in adolescents with ADHD compared to sleep extension (d = 0.56), but did not significantly affect adolescent self-repor

Effect: decline; d = 0.56

Sleep restriction caused significantly poorer parent-reported emotion regulation in adolescents with ADHD compared to sleep extension (d = 0.56), but did not significantly affect adolescent self-repor

Effect: decline; d = 0.56

Sleep restriction caused significantly poorer parent-reported emotion regulation in adolescents with ADHD compared to sleep extension (d = 0.56), but did not significantly affect adolescent self-repor

Effect: decline; d = 0.56

Sleep restriction caused significantly poorer parent-reported emotion regulation in adolescents with ADHD compared to sleep extension (d = 0.56), but did not significantly affect adolescent self-repor

Effect: decline; d = 0.56

Sleep restriction caused significantly poorer parent-reported emotion regulation in adolescents with ADHD compared to sleep extension (d = 0.56), but did not significantly affect adolescent self-repor

Effect: decline; d = 0.56

Sleep restriction caused significantly poorer parent-reported emotion regulation in adolescents with ADHD compared to sleep extension (d = 0.56), but did not significantly affect adolescent self-repor

Effect: decline; d = 0.56

Sleep restriction caused significantly poorer parent-reported emotion regulation in adolescents with ADHD compared to sleep extension (d = 0.56), but did not significantly affect adolescent self-repor

Effect: decline; d = 0.56

Sleep restriction caused significantly poorer parent-reported emotion regulation in adolescents with ADHD compared to sleep extension (d = 0.56), but did not significantly affect adolescent self-repor

Effect: decline; d = 0.56

Sleep restriction caused significantly poorer parent-reported emotion regulation in adolescents with ADHD compared to sleep extension (d = 0.56), but did not significantly affect adolescent self-repor

Effect: decline; d = 0.56

Sleep restriction caused significantly poorer parent-reported emotion regulation in adolescents with ADHD compared to sleep extension (d = 0.56), but did not significantly affect adolescent self-repor

Effect: decline; d = 0.56

Sleep restriction caused significantly poorer parent-reported emotion regulation in adolescents with ADHD compared to sleep extension (d = 0.56), but did not significantly affect adolescent self-repor

Effect: decline; d = 0.56

Sleep restriction caused significantly poorer parent-reported emotion regulation in adolescents with ADHD compared to sleep extension (d = 0.56), but did not significantly affect adolescent self-repor

Effect: decline; d = 0.56

All four hypothesized mechanism variables (trait mindfulness, emotion dysregulation, cognitive reappraisal, decentering) showed significant time x group interactions favoring ERT over MAC, and all fou

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g range .54 to 1.00

All four hypothesized mechanism variables (trait mindfulness, emotion dysregulation, cognitive reappraisal, decentering) showed significant time x group interactions favoring ERT over MAC, and all fou

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g range .54 to 1.00

All four hypothesized mechanism variables (trait mindfulness, emotion dysregulation, cognitive reappraisal, decentering) showed significant time x group interactions favoring ERT over MAC, and all fou

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g range .54 to 1.00

All four hypothesized mechanism variables (trait mindfulness, emotion dysregulation, cognitive reappraisal, decentering) showed significant time x group interactions favoring ERT over MAC, and all fou

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g range .54 to 1.00

All four hypothesized mechanism variables (trait mindfulness, emotion dysregulation, cognitive reappraisal, decentering) showed significant time x group interactions favoring ERT over MAC, and all fou

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g range .54 to 1.00

All four hypothesized mechanism variables (trait mindfulness, emotion dysregulation, cognitive reappraisal, decentering) showed significant time x group interactions favoring ERT over MAC, and all fou

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g range .54 to 1.00

All four hypothesized mechanism variables (trait mindfulness, emotion dysregulation, cognitive reappraisal, decentering) showed significant time x group interactions favoring ERT over MAC, and all fou

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g range .54 to 1.00

All four hypothesized mechanism variables (trait mindfulness, emotion dysregulation, cognitive reappraisal, decentering) showed significant time x group interactions favoring ERT over MAC, and all fou

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g range .54 to 1.00

All four hypothesized mechanism variables (trait mindfulness, emotion dysregulation, cognitive reappraisal, decentering) showed significant time x group interactions favoring ERT over MAC, and all fou

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g range .54 to 1.00

All four hypothesized mechanism variables (trait mindfulness, emotion dysregulation, cognitive reappraisal, decentering) showed significant time x group interactions favoring ERT over MAC, and all fou

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g range .54 to 1.00

All four hypothesized mechanism variables (trait mindfulness, emotion dysregulation, cognitive reappraisal, decentering) showed significant time x group interactions favoring ERT over MAC, and all fou

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g range .54 to 1.00

All four hypothesized mechanism variables (trait mindfulness, emotion dysregulation, cognitive reappraisal, decentering) showed significant time x group interactions favoring ERT over MAC, and all fou

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g range .54 to 1.00

All four hypothesized mechanism variables (trait mindfulness, emotion dysregulation, cognitive reappraisal, decentering) showed significant time x group interactions favoring ERT over MAC, and all fou

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g range .54 to 1.00

All four hypothesized mechanism variables (trait mindfulness, emotion dysregulation, cognitive reappraisal, decentering) showed significant time x group interactions favoring ERT over MAC, and all fou

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g range .54 to 1.00

All four hypothesized mechanism variables (trait mindfulness, emotion dysregulation, cognitive reappraisal, decentering) showed significant time x group interactions favoring ERT over MAC, and all fou

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g range .54 to 1.00

All four hypothesized mechanism variables (trait mindfulness, emotion dysregulation, cognitive reappraisal, decentering) showed significant time x group interactions favoring ERT over MAC, and all fou

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g range .54 to 1.00

All four hypothesized mechanism variables (trait mindfulness, emotion dysregulation, cognitive reappraisal, decentering) showed significant time x group interactions favoring ERT over MAC, and all fou

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g range .54 to 1.00

All four hypothesized mechanism variables (trait mindfulness, emotion dysregulation, cognitive reappraisal, decentering) showed significant time x group interactions favoring ERT over MAC, and all fou

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g range .54 to 1.00

All four hypothesized mechanism variables (trait mindfulness, emotion dysregulation, cognitive reappraisal, decentering) showed significant time x group interactions favoring ERT over MAC, and all fou

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g range .54 to 1.00

All four hypothesized mechanism variables (trait mindfulness, emotion dysregulation, cognitive reappraisal, decentering) showed significant time x group interactions favoring ERT over MAC, and all fou

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g range .54 to 1.00

All four hypothesized mechanism variables (trait mindfulness, emotion dysregulation, cognitive reappraisal, decentering) showed significant time x group interactions favoring ERT over MAC, and all fou

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g range .54 to 1.00

All four hypothesized mechanism variables (trait mindfulness, emotion dysregulation, cognitive reappraisal, decentering) showed significant time x group interactions favoring ERT over MAC, and all fou

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g range .54 to 1.00

All four hypothesized mechanism variables (trait mindfulness, emotion dysregulation, cognitive reappraisal, decentering) showed significant time x group interactions favoring ERT over MAC, and all fou

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g range .54 to 1.00