7-day point-prevalence smoking abstinence
Related entities
Findings (50)
None
improvementGreater adherence to transdermal nicotine patch use was significantly associated with higher odds of achieving smoking abstinence at end of treatment.
Effect: improvement; OR 1.06 per patch used; CI: 95% CI: 1.03-1.08
None
improvementGreater adherence to transdermal nicotine patch use was significantly associated with higher odds of achieving smoking abstinence at end of treatment.
Effect: improvement; OR 1.06 per patch used; CI: 95% CI: 1.03-1.08
None
improvementGreater adherence to transdermal nicotine patch use was significantly associated with higher odds of achieving smoking abstinence at end of treatment.
Effect: improvement; OR 1.06 per patch used; CI: 95% CI: 1.03-1.08
None
improvementGreater adherence to transdermal nicotine patch use was significantly associated with higher odds of achieving smoking abstinence at end of treatment.
Effect: improvement; OR 1.06 per patch used; CI: 95% CI: 1.03-1.08
None
improvementGreater adherence to transdermal nicotine patch use was significantly associated with higher odds of achieving smoking abstinence at end of treatment.
Effect: improvement; OR 1.06 per patch used; CI: 95% CI: 1.03-1.08
None
improvementGreater adherence to transdermal nicotine patch use was significantly associated with higher odds of achieving smoking abstinence at end of treatment.
Effect: improvement; OR 1.06 per patch used; CI: 95% CI: 1.03-1.08
None
improvementGreater adherence to transdermal nicotine patch use was significantly associated with higher odds of achieving smoking abstinence at end of treatment.
Effect: improvement; OR 1.06 per patch used; CI: 95% CI: 1.03-1.08
None
improvementGreater adherence to transdermal nicotine patch use was significantly associated with higher odds of achieving smoking abstinence at end of treatment.
Effect: improvement; OR 1.06 per patch used; CI: 95% CI: 1.03-1.08
None
improvementGreater adherence to transdermal nicotine patch use was significantly associated with higher odds of achieving smoking abstinence at end of treatment.
Effect: improvement; OR 1.06 per patch used; CI: 95% CI: 1.03-1.08
None
improvementGreater adherence to transdermal nicotine patch use was significantly associated with higher odds of achieving smoking abstinence at end of treatment.
Effect: improvement; OR 1.06 per patch used; CI: 95% CI: 1.03-1.08
None
improvementGreater adherence to transdermal nicotine patch use was significantly associated with higher odds of achieving smoking abstinence at end of treatment.
Effect: improvement; OR 1.06 per patch used; CI: 95% CI: 1.03-1.08
None
improvementGreater adherence to transdermal nicotine patch use was significantly associated with higher odds of achieving smoking abstinence at end of treatment.
Effect: improvement; OR 1.06 per patch used; CI: 95% CI: 1.03-1.08
None
improvementGreater adherence to transdermal nicotine patch use was significantly associated with higher odds of achieving smoking abstinence at end of treatment.
Effect: improvement; OR 1.06 per patch used; CI: 95% CI: 1.03-1.08
None
improvementGreater adherence to transdermal nicotine patch use was significantly associated with higher odds of achieving smoking abstinence at end of treatment.
Effect: improvement; OR 1.06 per patch used; CI: 95% CI: 1.03-1.08
None
improvementGreater adherence to transdermal nicotine patch use was significantly associated with higher odds of achieving smoking abstinence at end of treatment.
Effect: improvement; OR 1.06 per patch used; CI: 95% CI: 1.03-1.08
None
improvementGreater adherence to transdermal nicotine patch use was significantly associated with higher odds of achieving smoking abstinence at end of treatment.
Effect: improvement; OR 1.06 per patch used; CI: 95% CI: 1.03-1.08
None
improvementGreater adherence to transdermal nicotine patch use was significantly associated with higher odds of achieving smoking abstinence at end of treatment.
Effect: improvement; OR 1.06 per patch used; CI: 95% CI: 1.03-1.08
None
improvementGreater adherence to transdermal nicotine patch use was significantly associated with higher odds of achieving smoking abstinence at end of treatment.
Effect: improvement; OR 1.06 per patch used; CI: 95% CI: 1.03-1.08
None
improvementGreater adherence to transdermal nicotine patch use was significantly associated with higher odds of achieving smoking abstinence at end of treatment.
Effect: improvement; OR 1.06 per patch used; CI: 95% CI: 1.03-1.08
None
improvementGreater adherence to transdermal nicotine patch use was significantly associated with higher odds of achieving smoking abstinence at end of treatment.
Effect: improvement; OR 1.06 per patch used; CI: 95% CI: 1.03-1.08
None
improvementGreater adherence to transdermal nicotine patch use was significantly associated with higher odds of achieving smoking abstinence at end of treatment.
Effect: improvement; OR 1.06 per patch used; CI: 95% CI: 1.03-1.08
None
improvementGreater adherence to transdermal nicotine patch use was significantly associated with higher odds of achieving smoking abstinence at end of treatment.
Effect: improvement; OR 1.06 per patch used; CI: 95% CI: 1.03-1.08
None
improvementGreater adherence to transdermal nicotine patch use was significantly associated with higher odds of achieving smoking abstinence at end of treatment.
Effect: improvement; OR 1.06 per patch used; CI: 95% CI: 1.03-1.08
None
improvementGreater adherence to transdermal nicotine patch use was significantly associated with higher odds of achieving smoking abstinence at end of treatment.
Effect: improvement; OR 1.06 per patch used; CI: 95% CI: 1.03-1.08
None
improvementGreater adherence to transdermal nicotine patch use was significantly associated with higher odds of achieving smoking abstinence at end of treatment.
Effect: improvement; OR 1.06 per patch used; CI: 95% CI: 1.03-1.08
None
improvementGreater adherence to transdermal nicotine patch use was significantly associated with higher odds of achieving smoking abstinence at end of treatment.
Effect: improvement; OR 1.06 per patch used; CI: 95% CI: 1.03-1.08
None
improvementGreater adherence to transdermal nicotine patch use was significantly associated with higher odds of achieving smoking abstinence at end of treatment.
Effect: improvement; OR 1.06 per patch used; CI: 95% CI: 1.03-1.08
None
nullAdding bupropion-SR to nicotine patch and group CBT did not significantly increase 7-day point-prevalence smoking abstinence rates at end of treatment in smokers with unipolar depressive disorders, us
Effect: null; 36% vs 31%, Chi2=0.49
None
nullAdding bupropion-SR to nicotine patch and group CBT did not significantly increase 7-day point-prevalence smoking abstinence rates at end of treatment in smokers with unipolar depressive disorders, us
Effect: null; 36% vs 31%, Chi2=0.49
None
nullAdding bupropion-SR to nicotine patch and group CBT did not significantly increase 7-day point-prevalence smoking abstinence rates at end of treatment in smokers with unipolar depressive disorders, us
Effect: null; 36% vs 31%, Chi2=0.49
None
nullAdding bupropion-SR to nicotine patch and group CBT did not significantly increase 7-day point-prevalence smoking abstinence rates at end of treatment in smokers with unipolar depressive disorders, us
Effect: null; 36% vs 31%, Chi2=0.49
None
nullAdding bupropion-SR to nicotine patch and group CBT did not significantly increase 7-day point-prevalence smoking abstinence rates at end of treatment in smokers with unipolar depressive disorders, us
Effect: null; 36% vs 31%, Chi2=0.49
None
nullAdding bupropion-SR to nicotine patch and group CBT did not significantly increase 7-day point-prevalence smoking abstinence rates at end of treatment in smokers with unipolar depressive disorders, us
Effect: null; 36% vs 31%, Chi2=0.49
None
nullAdding bupropion-SR to nicotine patch and group CBT did not significantly increase 7-day point-prevalence smoking abstinence rates at end of treatment in smokers with unipolar depressive disorders, us
Effect: null; 36% vs 31%, Chi2=0.49
None
nullAdding bupropion-SR to nicotine patch and group CBT did not significantly increase 7-day point-prevalence smoking abstinence rates at end of treatment in smokers with unipolar depressive disorders, us
Effect: null; 36% vs 31%, Chi2=0.49
None
nullAdding bupropion-SR to nicotine patch and group CBT did not significantly increase 7-day point-prevalence smoking abstinence rates at end of treatment in smokers with unipolar depressive disorders, us
Effect: null; 36% vs 31%, Chi2=0.49
None
nullAdding bupropion-SR to nicotine patch and group CBT did not significantly increase 7-day point-prevalence smoking abstinence rates at end of treatment in smokers with unipolar depressive disorders, us
Effect: null; 36% vs 31%, Chi2=0.49
None
nullAdding bupropion-SR to nicotine patch and group CBT did not significantly increase 7-day point-prevalence smoking abstinence rates at end of treatment in smokers with unipolar depressive disorders, us
Effect: null; 36% vs 31%, Chi2=0.49
None
nullAdding bupropion-SR to nicotine patch and group CBT did not significantly increase 7-day point-prevalence smoking abstinence rates at end of treatment in smokers with unipolar depressive disorders, us
Effect: null; 36% vs 31%, Chi2=0.49
None
nullAdding bupropion-SR to nicotine patch and group CBT did not significantly increase 7-day point-prevalence smoking abstinence rates at end of treatment in smokers with unipolar depressive disorders, us
Effect: null; 36% vs 31%, Chi2=0.49
None
nullAdding bupropion-SR to nicotine patch and group CBT did not significantly increase 7-day point-prevalence smoking abstinence rates at end of treatment in smokers with unipolar depressive disorders, us
Effect: null; 36% vs 31%, Chi2=0.49
None
nullAdding bupropion-SR to nicotine patch and group CBT did not significantly increase 7-day point-prevalence smoking abstinence rates at end of treatment in smokers with unipolar depressive disorders, us
Effect: null; 36% vs 31%, Chi2=0.49
None
nullAdding bupropion-SR to nicotine patch and group CBT did not significantly increase 7-day point-prevalence smoking abstinence rates at end of treatment in smokers with unipolar depressive disorders, us
Effect: null; 36% vs 31%, Chi2=0.49
None
nullAdding bupropion-SR to nicotine patch and group CBT did not significantly increase 7-day point-prevalence smoking abstinence rates at end of treatment in smokers with unipolar depressive disorders, us
Effect: null; 36% vs 31%, Chi2=0.49
None
nullAdding bupropion-SR to nicotine patch and group CBT did not significantly increase 7-day point-prevalence smoking abstinence rates at end of treatment in smokers with unipolar depressive disorders, us
Effect: null; 36% vs 31%, Chi2=0.49
None
nullAdding bupropion-SR to nicotine patch and group CBT did not significantly increase 7-day point-prevalence smoking abstinence rates at end of treatment in smokers with unipolar depressive disorders, us
Effect: null; 36% vs 31%, Chi2=0.49
None
nullAdding bupropion-SR to nicotine patch and group CBT did not significantly increase 7-day point-prevalence smoking abstinence rates at end of treatment in smokers with unipolar depressive disorders, us
Effect: null; 36% vs 31%, Chi2=0.49
None
nullAdding bupropion-SR to nicotine patch and group CBT did not significantly increase 7-day point-prevalence smoking abstinence rates at end of treatment in smokers with unipolar depressive disorders, us
Effect: null; 36% vs 31%, Chi2=0.49
None
nullAdding bupropion-SR to nicotine patch and group CBT did not significantly increase 7-day point-prevalence smoking abstinence rates at end of treatment in smokers with unipolar depressive disorders, us
Effect: null; 36% vs 31%, Chi2=0.49
None
nullAdding bupropion-SR to nicotine patch and group CBT did not significantly increase 7-day point-prevalence smoking abstinence rates at end of treatment in smokers with unipolar depressive disorders, us
Effect: null; 36% vs 31%, Chi2=0.49