ExploreOutcome(Hypo)manic symptom severity trajectory
Outcome

(Hypo)manic symptom severity trajectory

Also known as: (Hypo)manic symptom severity trajectory over 24 months
3 findings 1 paper 4 related entities View in graph →

Related entities

interventions
conditions
populations
studys

Findings (27)

None
decline

Bipolar adolescents with comorbid ADHD were initially slower to improve in (hypo)manic symptoms, with more severe symptoms at 3 months compared to those without ADHD.

Effect: decline; F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)

Size: F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)
None
decline

Bipolar adolescents with comorbid ADHD were initially slower to improve in (hypo)manic symptoms, with more severe symptoms at 3 months compared to those without ADHD.

Effect: decline; F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)

Size: F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)
None
decline

Bipolar adolescents with comorbid ADHD were initially slower to improve in (hypo)manic symptoms, with more severe symptoms at 3 months compared to those without ADHD.

Effect: decline; F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)

Size: F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)
None
decline

Bipolar adolescents with comorbid ADHD were initially slower to improve in (hypo)manic symptoms, with more severe symptoms at 3 months compared to those without ADHD.

Effect: decline; F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)

Size: F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)
None
decline

Bipolar adolescents with comorbid ADHD were initially slower to improve in (hypo)manic symptoms, with more severe symptoms at 3 months compared to those without ADHD.

Effect: decline; F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)

Size: F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)
None
decline

Bipolar adolescents with comorbid ADHD were initially slower to improve in (hypo)manic symptoms, with more severe symptoms at 3 months compared to those without ADHD.

Effect: decline; F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)

Size: F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)
None
decline

Bipolar adolescents with comorbid ADHD were initially slower to improve in (hypo)manic symptoms, with more severe symptoms at 3 months compared to those without ADHD.

Effect: decline; F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)

Size: F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)
None
decline

Bipolar adolescents with comorbid ADHD were initially slower to improve in (hypo)manic symptoms, with more severe symptoms at 3 months compared to those without ADHD.

Effect: decline; F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)

Size: F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)
None
decline

Bipolar adolescents with comorbid ADHD were initially slower to improve in (hypo)manic symptoms, with more severe symptoms at 3 months compared to those without ADHD.

Effect: decline; F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)

Size: F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)
None
decline

Bipolar adolescents with comorbid ADHD were initially slower to improve in (hypo)manic symptoms, with more severe symptoms at 3 months compared to those without ADHD.

Effect: decline; F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)

Size: F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)
None
decline

Bipolar adolescents with comorbid ADHD were initially slower to improve in (hypo)manic symptoms, with more severe symptoms at 3 months compared to those without ADHD.

Effect: decline; F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)

Size: F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)
None
decline

Bipolar adolescents with comorbid ADHD were initially slower to improve in (hypo)manic symptoms, with more severe symptoms at 3 months compared to those without ADHD.

Effect: decline; F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)

Size: F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)
None
decline

Bipolar adolescents with comorbid ADHD were initially slower to improve in (hypo)manic symptoms, with more severe symptoms at 3 months compared to those without ADHD.

Effect: decline; F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)

Size: F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)
None
decline

Bipolar adolescents with comorbid ADHD were initially slower to improve in (hypo)manic symptoms, with more severe symptoms at 3 months compared to those without ADHD.

Effect: decline; F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)

Size: F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)
None
decline

Bipolar adolescents with comorbid ADHD were initially slower to improve in (hypo)manic symptoms, with more severe symptoms at 3 months compared to those without ADHD.

Effect: decline; F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)

Size: F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)
None
decline

Bipolar adolescents with comorbid ADHD were initially slower to improve in (hypo)manic symptoms, with more severe symptoms at 3 months compared to those without ADHD.

Effect: decline; F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)

Size: F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)
None
decline

Bipolar adolescents with comorbid ADHD were initially slower to improve in (hypo)manic symptoms, with more severe symptoms at 3 months compared to those without ADHD.

Effect: decline; F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)

Size: F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)
None
decline

Bipolar adolescents with comorbid ADHD were initially slower to improve in (hypo)manic symptoms, with more severe symptoms at 3 months compared to those without ADHD.

Effect: decline; F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)

Size: F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)
None
decline

Bipolar adolescents with comorbid ADHD were initially slower to improve in (hypo)manic symptoms, with more severe symptoms at 3 months compared to those without ADHD.

Effect: decline; F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)

Size: F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)
None
decline

Bipolar adolescents with comorbid ADHD were initially slower to improve in (hypo)manic symptoms, with more severe symptoms at 3 months compared to those without ADHD.

Effect: decline; F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)

Size: F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)
None
decline

Bipolar adolescents with comorbid ADHD were initially slower to improve in (hypo)manic symptoms, with more severe symptoms at 3 months compared to those without ADHD.

Effect: decline; F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)

Size: F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)
None
decline

Bipolar adolescents with comorbid ADHD were initially slower to improve in (hypo)manic symptoms, with more severe symptoms at 3 months compared to those without ADHD.

Effect: decline; F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)

Size: F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)
None
decline

Bipolar adolescents with comorbid ADHD were initially slower to improve in (hypo)manic symptoms, with more severe symptoms at 3 months compared to those without ADHD.

Effect: decline; F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)

Size: F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)
None
decline

Bipolar adolescents with comorbid ADHD were initially slower to improve in (hypo)manic symptoms, with more severe symptoms at 3 months compared to those without ADHD.

Effect: decline; F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)

Size: F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)
None
decline

Bipolar adolescents with comorbid ADHD were initially slower to improve in (hypo)manic symptoms, with more severe symptoms at 3 months compared to those without ADHD.

Effect: decline; F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)

Size: F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)
None
decline

Bipolar adolescents with comorbid ADHD were initially slower to improve in (hypo)manic symptoms, with more severe symptoms at 3 months compared to those without ADHD.

Effect: decline; F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)

Size: F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)
None
decline

Bipolar adolescents with comorbid ADHD were initially slower to improve in (hypo)manic symptoms, with more severe symptoms at 3 months compared to those without ADHD.

Effect: decline; F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)

Size: F(6,500)=2.22 (ADHD x time interaction)

Papers (1)