ExploreInterventionResponsive parenting intervention with sleep guidance
Intervention

Responsive parenting intervention with sleep guidance

Also known as: Responsive parenting (RP) intervention with sleep guidance emphasizing allowing infants to self-soothe to sleep without being held, rocked, or fed, delivered by research nurses at home visits at infant ages 3, 16, 28, and 40 weeks Responsive parenting (RP) intervention with sleep guidance emphasizing early bedtime by 8 PM, short bedtime routines under 45 minutes, and not feeding as last activity before bed, delivered by research nurses at home visits
6 findings 1 paper 5 related entities View in graph →

Related entities

conditions
outcomes
populations
studys

Findings (50)

None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly improved bedtime routine behaviors including earlier bedtimes, shorter bedtime routines, and reduced feeding as the last activity before bed at 16 a

Effect: improvement; 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks

Size: 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly improved bedtime routine behaviors including earlier bedtimes, shorter bedtime routines, and reduced feeding as the last activity before bed at 16 a

Effect: improvement; 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks

Size: 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly improved bedtime routine behaviors including earlier bedtimes, shorter bedtime routines, and reduced feeding as the last activity before bed at 16 a

Effect: improvement; 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks

Size: 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly improved bedtime routine behaviors including earlier bedtimes, shorter bedtime routines, and reduced feeding as the last activity before bed at 16 a

Effect: improvement; 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks

Size: 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly improved bedtime routine behaviors including earlier bedtimes, shorter bedtime routines, and reduced feeding as the last activity before bed at 16 a

Effect: improvement; 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks

Size: 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly improved bedtime routine behaviors including earlier bedtimes, shorter bedtime routines, and reduced feeding as the last activity before bed at 16 a

Effect: improvement; 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks

Size: 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly improved bedtime routine behaviors including earlier bedtimes, shorter bedtime routines, and reduced feeding as the last activity before bed at 16 a

Effect: improvement; 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks

Size: 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly improved bedtime routine behaviors including earlier bedtimes, shorter bedtime routines, and reduced feeding as the last activity before bed at 16 a

Effect: improvement; 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks

Size: 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly improved bedtime routine behaviors including earlier bedtimes, shorter bedtime routines, and reduced feeding as the last activity before bed at 16 a

Effect: improvement; 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks

Size: 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly improved bedtime routine behaviors including earlier bedtimes, shorter bedtime routines, and reduced feeding as the last activity before bed at 16 a

Effect: improvement; 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks

Size: 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly improved bedtime routine behaviors including earlier bedtimes, shorter bedtime routines, and reduced feeding as the last activity before bed at 16 a

Effect: improvement; 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks

Size: 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly improved bedtime routine behaviors including earlier bedtimes, shorter bedtime routines, and reduced feeding as the last activity before bed at 16 a

Effect: improvement; 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks

Size: 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly improved bedtime routine behaviors including earlier bedtimes, shorter bedtime routines, and reduced feeding as the last activity before bed at 16 a

Effect: improvement; 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks

Size: 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly improved bedtime routine behaviors including earlier bedtimes, shorter bedtime routines, and reduced feeding as the last activity before bed at 16 a

Effect: improvement; 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks

Size: 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly improved bedtime routine behaviors including earlier bedtimes, shorter bedtime routines, and reduced feeding as the last activity before bed at 16 a

Effect: improvement; 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks

Size: 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly improved bedtime routine behaviors including earlier bedtimes, shorter bedtime routines, and reduced feeding as the last activity before bed at 16 a

Effect: improvement; 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks

Size: 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly improved bedtime routine behaviors including earlier bedtimes, shorter bedtime routines, and reduced feeding as the last activity before bed at 16 a

Effect: improvement; 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks

Size: 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly improved bedtime routine behaviors including earlier bedtimes, shorter bedtime routines, and reduced feeding as the last activity before bed at 16 a

Effect: improvement; 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks

Size: 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly improved bedtime routine behaviors including earlier bedtimes, shorter bedtime routines, and reduced feeding as the last activity before bed at 16 a

Effect: improvement; 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks

Size: 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly improved bedtime routine behaviors including earlier bedtimes, shorter bedtime routines, and reduced feeding as the last activity before bed at 16 a

Effect: improvement; 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks

Size: 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly improved bedtime routine behaviors including earlier bedtimes, shorter bedtime routines, and reduced feeding as the last activity before bed at 16 a

Effect: improvement; 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks

Size: 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly improved bedtime routine behaviors including earlier bedtimes, shorter bedtime routines, and reduced feeding as the last activity before bed at 16 a

Effect: improvement; 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks

Size: 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly improved bedtime routine behaviors including earlier bedtimes, shorter bedtime routines, and reduced feeding as the last activity before bed at 16 a

Effect: improvement; 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks

Size: 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly improved bedtime routine behaviors including earlier bedtimes, shorter bedtime routines, and reduced feeding as the last activity before bed at 16 a

Effect: improvement; 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks

Size: 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly improved bedtime routine behaviors including earlier bedtimes, shorter bedtime routines, and reduced feeding as the last activity before bed at 16 a

Effect: improvement; 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks

Size: 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly improved bedtime routine behaviors including earlier bedtimes, shorter bedtime routines, and reduced feeding as the last activity before bed at 16 a

Effect: improvement; 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks

Size: 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly improved bedtime routine behaviors including earlier bedtimes, shorter bedtime routines, and reduced feeding as the last activity before bed at 16 a

Effect: improvement; 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks

Size: 46% vs 24% in bed by 8 PM at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly increased the proportion of infants who self-soothed to sleep at 8, 16, and 40 weeks compared with safety controls.

Effect: improvement; 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks

Size: 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly increased the proportion of infants who self-soothed to sleep at 8, 16, and 40 weeks compared with safety controls.

Effect: improvement; 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks

Size: 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly increased the proportion of infants who self-soothed to sleep at 8, 16, and 40 weeks compared with safety controls.

Effect: improvement; 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks

Size: 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly increased the proportion of infants who self-soothed to sleep at 8, 16, and 40 weeks compared with safety controls.

Effect: improvement; 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks

Size: 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly increased the proportion of infants who self-soothed to sleep at 8, 16, and 40 weeks compared with safety controls.

Effect: improvement; 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks

Size: 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly increased the proportion of infants who self-soothed to sleep at 8, 16, and 40 weeks compared with safety controls.

Effect: improvement; 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks

Size: 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly increased the proportion of infants who self-soothed to sleep at 8, 16, and 40 weeks compared with safety controls.

Effect: improvement; 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks

Size: 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly increased the proportion of infants who self-soothed to sleep at 8, 16, and 40 weeks compared with safety controls.

Effect: improvement; 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks

Size: 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly increased the proportion of infants who self-soothed to sleep at 8, 16, and 40 weeks compared with safety controls.

Effect: improvement; 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks

Size: 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly increased the proportion of infants who self-soothed to sleep at 8, 16, and 40 weeks compared with safety controls.

Effect: improvement; 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks

Size: 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly increased the proportion of infants who self-soothed to sleep at 8, 16, and 40 weeks compared with safety controls.

Effect: improvement; 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks

Size: 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly increased the proportion of infants who self-soothed to sleep at 8, 16, and 40 weeks compared with safety controls.

Effect: improvement; 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks

Size: 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly increased the proportion of infants who self-soothed to sleep at 8, 16, and 40 weeks compared with safety controls.

Effect: improvement; 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks

Size: 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly increased the proportion of infants who self-soothed to sleep at 8, 16, and 40 weeks compared with safety controls.

Effect: improvement; 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks

Size: 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly increased the proportion of infants who self-soothed to sleep at 8, 16, and 40 weeks compared with safety controls.

Effect: improvement; 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks

Size: 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly increased the proportion of infants who self-soothed to sleep at 8, 16, and 40 weeks compared with safety controls.

Effect: improvement; 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks

Size: 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly increased the proportion of infants who self-soothed to sleep at 8, 16, and 40 weeks compared with safety controls.

Effect: improvement; 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks

Size: 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly increased the proportion of infants who self-soothed to sleep at 8, 16, and 40 weeks compared with safety controls.

Effect: improvement; 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks

Size: 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly increased the proportion of infants who self-soothed to sleep at 8, 16, and 40 weeks compared with safety controls.

Effect: improvement; 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks

Size: 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly increased the proportion of infants who self-soothed to sleep at 8, 16, and 40 weeks compared with safety controls.

Effect: improvement; 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks

Size: 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly increased the proportion of infants who self-soothed to sleep at 8, 16, and 40 weeks compared with safety controls.

Effect: improvement; 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks

Size: 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly increased the proportion of infants who self-soothed to sleep at 8, 16, and 40 weeks compared with safety controls.

Effect: improvement; 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks

Size: 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks
None
improvement

The responsive parenting intervention significantly increased the proportion of infants who self-soothed to sleep at 8, 16, and 40 weeks compared with safety controls.

Effect: improvement; 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks

Size: 44% vs 28% at 16 weeks

Papers (1)