ExploreInterventionReferral for
Intervention

Referral for

Also known as: Referral for Referral for (observable entity) Referral for formal audiologic evaluation after hearing screening failure in low-risk pediatric cancer survivors
3 findings 1 paper 4 related entities View in graph →

Related entities

conditions
outcomes
populations
studys

Findings (27)

None
decline

Only 6 of 18 (33%) patients who failed the hearing screen underwent the recommended formal audiologic evaluation, consistent with follow-up compliance rates reported in primary care and school screeni

Effect: decline; 33% (6/18)

Size: 33% (6/18)
None
decline

Only 6 of 18 (33%) patients who failed the hearing screen underwent the recommended formal audiologic evaluation, consistent with follow-up compliance rates reported in primary care and school screeni

Effect: decline; 33% (6/18)

Size: 33% (6/18)
None
decline

Only 6 of 18 (33%) patients who failed the hearing screen underwent the recommended formal audiologic evaluation, consistent with follow-up compliance rates reported in primary care and school screeni

Effect: decline; 33% (6/18)

Size: 33% (6/18)
None
decline

Only 6 of 18 (33%) patients who failed the hearing screen underwent the recommended formal audiologic evaluation, consistent with follow-up compliance rates reported in primary care and school screeni

Effect: decline; 33% (6/18)

Size: 33% (6/18)
None
decline

Only 6 of 18 (33%) patients who failed the hearing screen underwent the recommended formal audiologic evaluation, consistent with follow-up compliance rates reported in primary care and school screeni

Effect: decline; 33% (6/18)

Size: 33% (6/18)
None
decline

Only 6 of 18 (33%) patients who failed the hearing screen underwent the recommended formal audiologic evaluation, consistent with follow-up compliance rates reported in primary care and school screeni

Effect: decline; 33% (6/18)

Size: 33% (6/18)
None
decline

Only 6 of 18 (33%) patients who failed the hearing screen underwent the recommended formal audiologic evaluation, consistent with follow-up compliance rates reported in primary care and school screeni

Effect: decline; 33% (6/18)

Size: 33% (6/18)
None
decline

Only 6 of 18 (33%) patients who failed the hearing screen underwent the recommended formal audiologic evaluation, consistent with follow-up compliance rates reported in primary care and school screeni

Effect: decline; 33% (6/18)

Size: 33% (6/18)
None
decline

Only 6 of 18 (33%) patients who failed the hearing screen underwent the recommended formal audiologic evaluation, consistent with follow-up compliance rates reported in primary care and school screeni

Effect: decline; 33% (6/18)

Size: 33% (6/18)
None
decline

Only 6 of 18 (33%) patients who failed the hearing screen underwent the recommended formal audiologic evaluation, consistent with follow-up compliance rates reported in primary care and school screeni

Effect: decline; 33% (6/18)

Size: 33% (6/18)
None
decline

Only 6 of 18 (33%) patients who failed the hearing screen underwent the recommended formal audiologic evaluation, consistent with follow-up compliance rates reported in primary care and school screeni

Effect: decline; 33% (6/18)

Size: 33% (6/18)
None
decline

Only 6 of 18 (33%) patients who failed the hearing screen underwent the recommended formal audiologic evaluation, consistent with follow-up compliance rates reported in primary care and school screeni

Effect: decline; 33% (6/18)

Size: 33% (6/18)
None
decline

Only 6 of 18 (33%) patients who failed the hearing screen underwent the recommended formal audiologic evaluation, consistent with follow-up compliance rates reported in primary care and school screeni

Effect: decline; 33% (6/18)

Size: 33% (6/18)
None
decline

Only 6 of 18 (33%) patients who failed the hearing screen underwent the recommended formal audiologic evaluation, consistent with follow-up compliance rates reported in primary care and school screeni

Effect: decline; 33% (6/18)

Size: 33% (6/18)
None
decline

Only 6 of 18 (33%) patients who failed the hearing screen underwent the recommended formal audiologic evaluation, consistent with follow-up compliance rates reported in primary care and school screeni

Effect: decline; 33% (6/18)

Size: 33% (6/18)
None
decline

Only 6 of 18 (33%) patients who failed the hearing screen underwent the recommended formal audiologic evaluation, consistent with follow-up compliance rates reported in primary care and school screeni

Effect: decline; 33% (6/18)

Size: 33% (6/18)
None
decline

Only 6 of 18 (33%) patients who failed the hearing screen underwent the recommended formal audiologic evaluation, consistent with follow-up compliance rates reported in primary care and school screeni

Effect: decline; 33% (6/18)

Size: 33% (6/18)
None
decline

Only 6 of 18 (33%) patients who failed the hearing screen underwent the recommended formal audiologic evaluation, consistent with follow-up compliance rates reported in primary care and school screeni

Effect: decline; 33% (6/18)

Size: 33% (6/18)
None
decline

Only 6 of 18 (33%) patients who failed the hearing screen underwent the recommended formal audiologic evaluation, consistent with follow-up compliance rates reported in primary care and school screeni

Effect: decline; 33% (6/18)

Size: 33% (6/18)
None
decline

Only 6 of 18 (33%) patients who failed the hearing screen underwent the recommended formal audiologic evaluation, consistent with follow-up compliance rates reported in primary care and school screeni

Effect: decline; 33% (6/18)

Size: 33% (6/18)
None
decline

Only 6 of 18 (33%) patients who failed the hearing screen underwent the recommended formal audiologic evaluation, consistent with follow-up compliance rates reported in primary care and school screeni

Effect: decline; 33% (6/18)

Size: 33% (6/18)
None
decline

Only 6 of 18 (33%) patients who failed the hearing screen underwent the recommended formal audiologic evaluation, consistent with follow-up compliance rates reported in primary care and school screeni

Effect: decline; 33% (6/18)

Size: 33% (6/18)
None
decline

Only 6 of 18 (33%) patients who failed the hearing screen underwent the recommended formal audiologic evaluation, consistent with follow-up compliance rates reported in primary care and school screeni

Effect: decline; 33% (6/18)

Size: 33% (6/18)
None
decline

Only 6 of 18 (33%) patients who failed the hearing screen underwent the recommended formal audiologic evaluation, consistent with follow-up compliance rates reported in primary care and school screeni

Effect: decline; 33% (6/18)

Size: 33% (6/18)
None
decline

Only 6 of 18 (33%) patients who failed the hearing screen underwent the recommended formal audiologic evaluation, consistent with follow-up compliance rates reported in primary care and school screeni

Effect: decline; 33% (6/18)

Size: 33% (6/18)
None
decline

Only 6 of 18 (33%) patients who failed the hearing screen underwent the recommended formal audiologic evaluation, consistent with follow-up compliance rates reported in primary care and school screeni

Effect: decline; 33% (6/18)

Size: 33% (6/18)
None
decline

Only 6 of 18 (33%) patients who failed the hearing screen underwent the recommended formal audiologic evaluation, consistent with follow-up compliance rates reported in primary care and school screeni

Effect: decline; 33% (6/18)

Size: 33% (6/18)

Papers (1)