ExploreInterventionIntensive glycemic control
Intervention

Intensive glycemic control

Also known as: Intensive glycemic control (HbA1c <7%) in older adults with diabetes, including those with complex/poor health
3 findings 1 paper 3 related entities View in graph →

Related entities

outcomes
populations
studys

Findings (27)

None
adverse

Among 1,288 adults aged 65+ with diabetes, 61.5% had HbA1c less than 7% and 54.9% of these were treated with insulin or sulfonylureas; among patients with very complex/poor health, 56.4% had HbA1c <7%

Effect: adverse; 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.4% had HbA1c <7% and 37.9% had HbA1c <6.5%

Size: 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.
None
adverse

Among 1,288 adults aged 65+ with diabetes, 61.5% had HbA1c less than 7% and 54.9% of these were treated with insulin or sulfonylureas; among patients with very complex/poor health, 56.4% had HbA1c <7%

Effect: adverse; 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.4% had HbA1c <7% and 37.9% had HbA1c <6.5%

Size: 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.
None
adverse

Among 1,288 adults aged 65+ with diabetes, 61.5% had HbA1c less than 7% and 54.9% of these were treated with insulin or sulfonylureas; among patients with very complex/poor health, 56.4% had HbA1c <7%

Effect: adverse; 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.4% had HbA1c <7% and 37.9% had HbA1c <6.5%

Size: 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.
None
adverse

Among 1,288 adults aged 65+ with diabetes, 61.5% had HbA1c less than 7% and 54.9% of these were treated with insulin or sulfonylureas; among patients with very complex/poor health, 56.4% had HbA1c <7%

Effect: adverse; 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.4% had HbA1c <7% and 37.9% had HbA1c <6.5%

Size: 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.
None
adverse

Among 1,288 adults aged 65+ with diabetes, 61.5% had HbA1c less than 7% and 54.9% of these were treated with insulin or sulfonylureas; among patients with very complex/poor health, 56.4% had HbA1c <7%

Effect: adverse; 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.4% had HbA1c <7% and 37.9% had HbA1c <6.5%

Size: 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.
None
adverse

Among 1,288 adults aged 65+ with diabetes, 61.5% had HbA1c less than 7% and 54.9% of these were treated with insulin or sulfonylureas; among patients with very complex/poor health, 56.4% had HbA1c <7%

Effect: adverse; 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.4% had HbA1c <7% and 37.9% had HbA1c <6.5%

Size: 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.
None
adverse

Among 1,288 adults aged 65+ with diabetes, 61.5% had HbA1c less than 7% and 54.9% of these were treated with insulin or sulfonylureas; among patients with very complex/poor health, 56.4% had HbA1c <7%

Effect: adverse; 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.4% had HbA1c <7% and 37.9% had HbA1c <6.5%

Size: 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.
None
adverse

Among 1,288 adults aged 65+ with diabetes, 61.5% had HbA1c less than 7% and 54.9% of these were treated with insulin or sulfonylureas; among patients with very complex/poor health, 56.4% had HbA1c <7%

Effect: adverse; 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.4% had HbA1c <7% and 37.9% had HbA1c <6.5%

Size: 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.
None
adverse

Among 1,288 adults aged 65+ with diabetes, 61.5% had HbA1c less than 7% and 54.9% of these were treated with insulin or sulfonylureas; among patients with very complex/poor health, 56.4% had HbA1c <7%

Effect: adverse; 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.4% had HbA1c <7% and 37.9% had HbA1c <6.5%

Size: 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.
None
adverse

Among 1,288 adults aged 65+ with diabetes, 61.5% had HbA1c less than 7% and 54.9% of these were treated with insulin or sulfonylureas; among patients with very complex/poor health, 56.4% had HbA1c <7%

Effect: adverse; 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.4% had HbA1c <7% and 37.9% had HbA1c <6.5%

Size: 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.
None
adverse

Among 1,288 adults aged 65+ with diabetes, 61.5% had HbA1c less than 7% and 54.9% of these were treated with insulin or sulfonylureas; among patients with very complex/poor health, 56.4% had HbA1c <7%

Effect: adverse; 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.4% had HbA1c <7% and 37.9% had HbA1c <6.5%

Size: 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.
None
adverse

Among 1,288 adults aged 65+ with diabetes, 61.5% had HbA1c less than 7% and 54.9% of these were treated with insulin or sulfonylureas; among patients with very complex/poor health, 56.4% had HbA1c <7%

Effect: adverse; 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.4% had HbA1c <7% and 37.9% had HbA1c <6.5%

Size: 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.
None
adverse

Among 1,288 adults aged 65+ with diabetes, 61.5% had HbA1c less than 7% and 54.9% of these were treated with insulin or sulfonylureas; among patients with very complex/poor health, 56.4% had HbA1c <7%

Effect: adverse; 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.4% had HbA1c <7% and 37.9% had HbA1c <6.5%

Size: 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.
None
adverse

Among 1,288 adults aged 65+ with diabetes, 61.5% had HbA1c less than 7% and 54.9% of these were treated with insulin or sulfonylureas; among patients with very complex/poor health, 56.4% had HbA1c <7%

Effect: adverse; 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.4% had HbA1c <7% and 37.9% had HbA1c <6.5%

Size: 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.
None
adverse

Among 1,288 adults aged 65+ with diabetes, 61.5% had HbA1c less than 7% and 54.9% of these were treated with insulin or sulfonylureas; among patients with very complex/poor health, 56.4% had HbA1c <7%

Effect: adverse; 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.4% had HbA1c <7% and 37.9% had HbA1c <6.5%

Size: 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.
None
adverse

Among 1,288 adults aged 65+ with diabetes, 61.5% had HbA1c less than 7% and 54.9% of these were treated with insulin or sulfonylureas; among patients with very complex/poor health, 56.4% had HbA1c <7%

Effect: adverse; 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.4% had HbA1c <7% and 37.9% had HbA1c <6.5%

Size: 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.
None
adverse

Among 1,288 adults aged 65+ with diabetes, 61.5% had HbA1c less than 7% and 54.9% of these were treated with insulin or sulfonylureas; among patients with very complex/poor health, 56.4% had HbA1c <7%

Effect: adverse; 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.4% had HbA1c <7% and 37.9% had HbA1c <6.5%

Size: 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.
None
adverse

Among 1,288 adults aged 65+ with diabetes, 61.5% had HbA1c less than 7% and 54.9% of these were treated with insulin or sulfonylureas; among patients with very complex/poor health, 56.4% had HbA1c <7%

Effect: adverse; 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.4% had HbA1c <7% and 37.9% had HbA1c <6.5%

Size: 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.
None
adverse

Among 1,288 adults aged 65+ with diabetes, 61.5% had HbA1c less than 7% and 54.9% of these were treated with insulin or sulfonylureas; among patients with very complex/poor health, 56.4% had HbA1c <7%

Effect: adverse; 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.4% had HbA1c <7% and 37.9% had HbA1c <6.5%

Size: 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.
None
adverse

Among 1,288 adults aged 65+ with diabetes, 61.5% had HbA1c less than 7% and 54.9% of these were treated with insulin or sulfonylureas; among patients with very complex/poor health, 56.4% had HbA1c <7%

Effect: adverse; 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.4% had HbA1c <7% and 37.9% had HbA1c <6.5%

Size: 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.
None
adverse

Among 1,288 adults aged 65+ with diabetes, 61.5% had HbA1c less than 7% and 54.9% of these were treated with insulin or sulfonylureas; among patients with very complex/poor health, 56.4% had HbA1c <7%

Effect: adverse; 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.4% had HbA1c <7% and 37.9% had HbA1c <6.5%

Size: 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.
None
adverse

Among 1,288 adults aged 65+ with diabetes, 61.5% had HbA1c less than 7% and 54.9% of these were treated with insulin or sulfonylureas; among patients with very complex/poor health, 56.4% had HbA1c <7%

Effect: adverse; 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.4% had HbA1c <7% and 37.9% had HbA1c <6.5%

Size: 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.
None
adverse

Among 1,288 adults aged 65+ with diabetes, 61.5% had HbA1c less than 7% and 54.9% of these were treated with insulin or sulfonylureas; among patients with very complex/poor health, 56.4% had HbA1c <7%

Effect: adverse; 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.4% had HbA1c <7% and 37.9% had HbA1c <6.5%

Size: 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.
None
adverse

Among 1,288 adults aged 65+ with diabetes, 61.5% had HbA1c less than 7% and 54.9% of these were treated with insulin or sulfonylureas; among patients with very complex/poor health, 56.4% had HbA1c <7%

Effect: adverse; 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.4% had HbA1c <7% and 37.9% had HbA1c <6.5%

Size: 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.
None
adverse

Among 1,288 adults aged 65+ with diabetes, 61.5% had HbA1c less than 7% and 54.9% of these were treated with insulin or sulfonylureas; among patients with very complex/poor health, 56.4% had HbA1c <7%

Effect: adverse; 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.4% had HbA1c <7% and 37.9% had HbA1c <6.5%

Size: 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.
None
adverse

Among 1,288 adults aged 65+ with diabetes, 61.5% had HbA1c less than 7% and 54.9% of these were treated with insulin or sulfonylureas; among patients with very complex/poor health, 56.4% had HbA1c <7%

Effect: adverse; 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.4% had HbA1c <7% and 37.9% had HbA1c <6.5%

Size: 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.
None
adverse

Among 1,288 adults aged 65+ with diabetes, 61.5% had HbA1c less than 7% and 54.9% of these were treated with insulin or sulfonylureas; among patients with very complex/poor health, 56.4% had HbA1c <7%

Effect: adverse; 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.4% had HbA1c <7% and 37.9% had HbA1c <6.5%

Size: 61.5% had HbA1c <7%; among complex/poor health patients, 56.

Papers (1)