Diagnostic audiologic evaluation

Of 6 screen failures who underwent formal audiologic evaluation, 3 (50%) demonstrated confirmed hearing loss: 2 conductive and 1 sensorineural, all in the 4000-8000 Hz range.

Effect: decline; 3/6 (50%)

Of 6 screen failures who underwent formal audiologic evaluation, 3 (50%) demonstrated confirmed hearing loss: 2 conductive and 1 sensorineural, all in the 4000-8000 Hz range.

Effect: decline; 3/6 (50%)

Of 6 screen failures who underwent formal audiologic evaluation, 3 (50%) demonstrated confirmed hearing loss: 2 conductive and 1 sensorineural, all in the 4000-8000 Hz range.

Effect: decline; 3/6 (50%)

Of 6 screen failures who underwent formal audiologic evaluation, 3 (50%) demonstrated confirmed hearing loss: 2 conductive and 1 sensorineural, all in the 4000-8000 Hz range.

Effect: decline; 3/6 (50%)

Of 6 screen failures who underwent formal audiologic evaluation, 3 (50%) demonstrated confirmed hearing loss: 2 conductive and 1 sensorineural, all in the 4000-8000 Hz range.

Effect: decline; 3/6 (50%)

Of 6 screen failures who underwent formal audiologic evaluation, 3 (50%) demonstrated confirmed hearing loss: 2 conductive and 1 sensorineural, all in the 4000-8000 Hz range.

Effect: decline; 3/6 (50%)

Of 6 screen failures who underwent formal audiologic evaluation, 3 (50%) demonstrated confirmed hearing loss: 2 conductive and 1 sensorineural, all in the 4000-8000 Hz range.

Effect: decline; 3/6 (50%)

Of 6 screen failures who underwent formal audiologic evaluation, 3 (50%) demonstrated confirmed hearing loss: 2 conductive and 1 sensorineural, all in the 4000-8000 Hz range.

Effect: decline; 3/6 (50%)

Of 6 screen failures who underwent formal audiologic evaluation, 3 (50%) demonstrated confirmed hearing loss: 2 conductive and 1 sensorineural, all in the 4000-8000 Hz range.

Effect: decline; 3/6 (50%)

Of 6 screen failures who underwent formal audiologic evaluation, 3 (50%) demonstrated confirmed hearing loss: 2 conductive and 1 sensorineural, all in the 4000-8000 Hz range.

Effect: decline; 3/6 (50%)

Of 6 screen failures who underwent formal audiologic evaluation, 3 (50%) demonstrated confirmed hearing loss: 2 conductive and 1 sensorineural, all in the 4000-8000 Hz range.

Effect: decline; 3/6 (50%)

Of 6 screen failures who underwent formal audiologic evaluation, 3 (50%) demonstrated confirmed hearing loss: 2 conductive and 1 sensorineural, all in the 4000-8000 Hz range.

Effect: decline; 3/6 (50%)

Of 6 screen failures who underwent formal audiologic evaluation, 3 (50%) demonstrated confirmed hearing loss: 2 conductive and 1 sensorineural, all in the 4000-8000 Hz range.

Effect: decline; 3/6 (50%)

Of 6 screen failures who underwent formal audiologic evaluation, 3 (50%) demonstrated confirmed hearing loss: 2 conductive and 1 sensorineural, all in the 4000-8000 Hz range.

Effect: decline; 3/6 (50%)

Of 6 screen failures who underwent formal audiologic evaluation, 3 (50%) demonstrated confirmed hearing loss: 2 conductive and 1 sensorineural, all in the 4000-8000 Hz range.

Effect: decline; 3/6 (50%)

Of 6 screen failures who underwent formal audiologic evaluation, 3 (50%) demonstrated confirmed hearing loss: 2 conductive and 1 sensorineural, all in the 4000-8000 Hz range.

Effect: decline; 3/6 (50%)

Of 6 screen failures who underwent formal audiologic evaluation, 3 (50%) demonstrated confirmed hearing loss: 2 conductive and 1 sensorineural, all in the 4000-8000 Hz range.

Effect: decline; 3/6 (50%)

Of 6 screen failures who underwent formal audiologic evaluation, 3 (50%) demonstrated confirmed hearing loss: 2 conductive and 1 sensorineural, all in the 4000-8000 Hz range.

Effect: decline; 3/6 (50%)

Of 6 screen failures who underwent formal audiologic evaluation, 3 (50%) demonstrated confirmed hearing loss: 2 conductive and 1 sensorineural, all in the 4000-8000 Hz range.

Effect: decline; 3/6 (50%)

Of 6 screen failures who underwent formal audiologic evaluation, 3 (50%) demonstrated confirmed hearing loss: 2 conductive and 1 sensorineural, all in the 4000-8000 Hz range.

Effect: decline; 3/6 (50%)

Of 6 screen failures who underwent formal audiologic evaluation, 3 (50%) demonstrated confirmed hearing loss: 2 conductive and 1 sensorineural, all in the 4000-8000 Hz range.

Effect: decline; 3/6 (50%)

Of 6 screen failures who underwent formal audiologic evaluation, 3 (50%) demonstrated confirmed hearing loss: 2 conductive and 1 sensorineural, all in the 4000-8000 Hz range.

Effect: decline; 3/6 (50%)

Of 6 screen failures who underwent formal audiologic evaluation, 3 (50%) demonstrated confirmed hearing loss: 2 conductive and 1 sensorineural, all in the 4000-8000 Hz range.

Effect: decline; 3/6 (50%)

Of 6 screen failures who underwent formal audiologic evaluation, 3 (50%) demonstrated confirmed hearing loss: 2 conductive and 1 sensorineural, all in the 4000-8000 Hz range.

Effect: decline; 3/6 (50%)

Of 6 screen failures who underwent formal audiologic evaluation, 3 (50%) demonstrated confirmed hearing loss: 2 conductive and 1 sensorineural, all in the 4000-8000 Hz range.

Effect: decline; 3/6 (50%)

Of 6 screen failures who underwent formal audiologic evaluation, 3 (50%) demonstrated confirmed hearing loss: 2 conductive and 1 sensorineural, all in the 4000-8000 Hz range.

Effect: decline; 3/6 (50%)

Of 6 screen failures who underwent formal audiologic evaluation, 3 (50%) demonstrated confirmed hearing loss: 2 conductive and 1 sensorineural, all in the 4000-8000 Hz range.

Effect: decline; 3/6 (50%)