ExploreInterventionCompound beta-blockers
Intervention

Compound beta-blockers

Also known as: Clinician prescribing of beta-blockers for ASCVD patients who have intellectual/developmental disabilities Clinician prescribing of beta-blockers for heart failure patients who have intellectual/developmental disabilities Compound beta-blockers Compound beta-blockers (product) Compound beta-blockers (substance) HF
6 findings 1 paper 4 related entities View in graph →

Related entities

conditions
outcomes
studys

Findings (50)

None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and heart failure were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (46.8

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.66; CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79

Size: adjusted OR 0.66 CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and heart failure were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (46.8

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.66; CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79

Size: adjusted OR 0.66 CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and heart failure were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (46.8

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.66; CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79

Size: adjusted OR 0.66 CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and heart failure were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (46.8

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.66; CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79

Size: adjusted OR 0.66 CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and heart failure were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (46.8

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.66; CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79

Size: adjusted OR 0.66 CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and heart failure were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (46.8

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.66; CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79

Size: adjusted OR 0.66 CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and heart failure were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (46.8

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.66; CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79

Size: adjusted OR 0.66 CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and heart failure were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (46.8

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.66; CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79

Size: adjusted OR 0.66 CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and heart failure were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (46.8

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.66; CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79

Size: adjusted OR 0.66 CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and heart failure were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (46.8

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.66; CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79

Size: adjusted OR 0.66 CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and heart failure were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (46.8

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.66; CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79

Size: adjusted OR 0.66 CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and heart failure were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (46.8

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.66; CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79

Size: adjusted OR 0.66 CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and heart failure were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (46.8

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.66; CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79

Size: adjusted OR 0.66 CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and heart failure were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (46.8

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.66; CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79

Size: adjusted OR 0.66 CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and heart failure were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (46.8

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.66; CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79

Size: adjusted OR 0.66 CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and heart failure were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (46.8

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.66; CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79

Size: adjusted OR 0.66 CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and heart failure were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (46.8

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.66; CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79

Size: adjusted OR 0.66 CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and heart failure were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (46.8

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.66; CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79

Size: adjusted OR 0.66 CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and heart failure were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (46.8

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.66; CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79

Size: adjusted OR 0.66 CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and heart failure were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (46.8

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.66; CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79

Size: adjusted OR 0.66 CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and heart failure were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (46.8

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.66; CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79

Size: adjusted OR 0.66 CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and heart failure were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (46.8

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.66; CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79

Size: adjusted OR 0.66 CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and heart failure were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (46.8

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.66; CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79

Size: adjusted OR 0.66 CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and heart failure were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (46.8

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.66; CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79

Size: adjusted OR 0.66 CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and heart failure were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (46.8

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.66; CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79

Size: adjusted OR 0.66 CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and heart failure were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (46.8

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.66; CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79

Size: adjusted OR 0.66 CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and heart failure were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (46.8

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.66; CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79

Size: adjusted OR 0.66 CI: 95% CI = 0.55-0.79
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (35.8% vs 48.

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.65; CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73

Size: adjusted OR 0.65 CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (35.8% vs 48.

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.65; CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73

Size: adjusted OR 0.65 CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (35.8% vs 48.

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.65; CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73

Size: adjusted OR 0.65 CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (35.8% vs 48.

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.65; CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73

Size: adjusted OR 0.65 CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (35.8% vs 48.

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.65; CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73

Size: adjusted OR 0.65 CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (35.8% vs 48.

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.65; CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73

Size: adjusted OR 0.65 CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (35.8% vs 48.

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.65; CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73

Size: adjusted OR 0.65 CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (35.8% vs 48.

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.65; CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73

Size: adjusted OR 0.65 CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (35.8% vs 48.

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.65; CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73

Size: adjusted OR 0.65 CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (35.8% vs 48.

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.65; CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73

Size: adjusted OR 0.65 CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (35.8% vs 48.

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.65; CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73

Size: adjusted OR 0.65 CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (35.8% vs 48.

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.65; CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73

Size: adjusted OR 0.65 CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (35.8% vs 48.

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.65; CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73

Size: adjusted OR 0.65 CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (35.8% vs 48.

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.65; CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73

Size: adjusted OR 0.65 CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (35.8% vs 48.

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.65; CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73

Size: adjusted OR 0.65 CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (35.8% vs 48.

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.65; CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73

Size: adjusted OR 0.65 CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (35.8% vs 48.

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.65; CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73

Size: adjusted OR 0.65 CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (35.8% vs 48.

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.65; CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73

Size: adjusted OR 0.65 CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (35.8% vs 48.

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.65; CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73

Size: adjusted OR 0.65 CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (35.8% vs 48.

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.65; CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73

Size: adjusted OR 0.65 CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (35.8% vs 48.

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.65; CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73

Size: adjusted OR 0.65 CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (35.8% vs 48.

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.65; CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73

Size: adjusted OR 0.65 CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73
None
decline

Commercially insured patients with intellectual/developmental disabilities and ASCVD were significantly less likely to have pharmacy claims for beta-blockers compared to non-IDD patients (35.8% vs 48.

Effect: decline; adjusted OR 0.65; CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73

Size: adjusted OR 0.65 CI: 95% CI = 0.58-0.73

Papers (1)