dietary tracking
Related entities
Findings (27)
None
declineDiet quality trajectories were characterized as stable horizontal lines from preconception to child age 8-9 years, with 5 distinct groups (poor 5%, poor-medium 23%, medium 39%, medium-better 28%, best
Effect: decline
None
declineDiet quality trajectories were characterized as stable horizontal lines from preconception to child age 8-9 years, with 5 distinct groups (poor 5%, poor-medium 23%, medium 39%, medium-better 28%, best
Effect: decline
None
declineDiet quality trajectories were characterized as stable horizontal lines from preconception to child age 8-9 years, with 5 distinct groups (poor 5%, poor-medium 23%, medium 39%, medium-better 28%, best
Effect: decline
None
declineDiet quality trajectories were characterized as stable horizontal lines from preconception to child age 8-9 years, with 5 distinct groups (poor 5%, poor-medium 23%, medium 39%, medium-better 28%, best
Effect: decline
None
declineDiet quality trajectories were characterized as stable horizontal lines from preconception to child age 8-9 years, with 5 distinct groups (poor 5%, poor-medium 23%, medium 39%, medium-better 28%, best
Effect: decline
None
declineDiet quality trajectories were characterized as stable horizontal lines from preconception to child age 8-9 years, with 5 distinct groups (poor 5%, poor-medium 23%, medium 39%, medium-better 28%, best
Effect: decline
None
declineDiet quality trajectories were characterized as stable horizontal lines from preconception to child age 8-9 years, with 5 distinct groups (poor 5%, poor-medium 23%, medium 39%, medium-better 28%, best
Effect: decline
None
declineDiet quality trajectories were characterized as stable horizontal lines from preconception to child age 8-9 years, with 5 distinct groups (poor 5%, poor-medium 23%, medium 39%, medium-better 28%, best
Effect: decline
None
declineDiet quality trajectories were characterized as stable horizontal lines from preconception to child age 8-9 years, with 5 distinct groups (poor 5%, poor-medium 23%, medium 39%, medium-better 28%, best
Effect: decline
None
declineDiet quality trajectories were characterized as stable horizontal lines from preconception to child age 8-9 years, with 5 distinct groups (poor 5%, poor-medium 23%, medium 39%, medium-better 28%, best
Effect: decline
None
declineDiet quality trajectories were characterized as stable horizontal lines from preconception to child age 8-9 years, with 5 distinct groups (poor 5%, poor-medium 23%, medium 39%, medium-better 28%, best
Effect: decline
None
declineDiet quality trajectories were characterized as stable horizontal lines from preconception to child age 8-9 years, with 5 distinct groups (poor 5%, poor-medium 23%, medium 39%, medium-better 28%, best
Effect: decline
None
declineDiet quality trajectories were characterized as stable horizontal lines from preconception to child age 8-9 years, with 5 distinct groups (poor 5%, poor-medium 23%, medium 39%, medium-better 28%, best
Effect: decline
None
declineDiet quality trajectories were characterized as stable horizontal lines from preconception to child age 8-9 years, with 5 distinct groups (poor 5%, poor-medium 23%, medium 39%, medium-better 28%, best
Effect: decline
None
declineDiet quality trajectories were characterized as stable horizontal lines from preconception to child age 8-9 years, with 5 distinct groups (poor 5%, poor-medium 23%, medium 39%, medium-better 28%, best
Effect: decline
None
declineDiet quality trajectories were characterized as stable horizontal lines from preconception to child age 8-9 years, with 5 distinct groups (poor 5%, poor-medium 23%, medium 39%, medium-better 28%, best
Effect: decline
None
declineDiet quality trajectories were characterized as stable horizontal lines from preconception to child age 8-9 years, with 5 distinct groups (poor 5%, poor-medium 23%, medium 39%, medium-better 28%, best
Effect: decline
None
declineDiet quality trajectories were characterized as stable horizontal lines from preconception to child age 8-9 years, with 5 distinct groups (poor 5%, poor-medium 23%, medium 39%, medium-better 28%, best
Effect: decline
None
declineDiet quality trajectories were characterized as stable horizontal lines from preconception to child age 8-9 years, with 5 distinct groups (poor 5%, poor-medium 23%, medium 39%, medium-better 28%, best
Effect: decline
None
declineDiet quality trajectories were characterized as stable horizontal lines from preconception to child age 8-9 years, with 5 distinct groups (poor 5%, poor-medium 23%, medium 39%, medium-better 28%, best
Effect: decline
None
declineDiet quality trajectories were characterized as stable horizontal lines from preconception to child age 8-9 years, with 5 distinct groups (poor 5%, poor-medium 23%, medium 39%, medium-better 28%, best
Effect: decline
None
declineDiet quality trajectories were characterized as stable horizontal lines from preconception to child age 8-9 years, with 5 distinct groups (poor 5%, poor-medium 23%, medium 39%, medium-better 28%, best
Effect: decline
None
declineDiet quality trajectories were characterized as stable horizontal lines from preconception to child age 8-9 years, with 5 distinct groups (poor 5%, poor-medium 23%, medium 39%, medium-better 28%, best
Effect: decline
None
declineDiet quality trajectories were characterized as stable horizontal lines from preconception to child age 8-9 years, with 5 distinct groups (poor 5%, poor-medium 23%, medium 39%, medium-better 28%, best
Effect: decline
None
declineDiet quality trajectories were characterized as stable horizontal lines from preconception to child age 8-9 years, with 5 distinct groups (poor 5%, poor-medium 23%, medium 39%, medium-better 28%, best
Effect: decline
None
declineDiet quality trajectories were characterized as stable horizontal lines from preconception to child age 8-9 years, with 5 distinct groups (poor 5%, poor-medium 23%, medium 39%, medium-better 28%, best
Effect: decline
None
declineDiet quality trajectories were characterized as stable horizontal lines from preconception to child age 8-9 years, with 5 distinct groups (poor 5%, poor-medium 23%, medium 39%, medium-better 28%, best
Effect: decline