Respiratory distress syndrome

There was no significant difference in functional residual capacity between rescue antenatal steroid and placebo groups (24.8 vs 22.0 mL/kg, p=0.19), suggesting structural lung changes from initial AS

Effect: null; 24.8 versus 22.0 mL/kg; CI: adjusted 95% CI for difference: -1.40 to 6.62

There was no significant difference in functional residual capacity between rescue antenatal steroid and placebo groups (24.8 vs 22.0 mL/kg, p=0.19), suggesting structural lung changes from initial AS

Effect: null; 24.8 versus 22.0 mL/kg; CI: adjusted 95% CI for difference: -1.40 to 6.62

There was no significant difference in functional residual capacity between rescue antenatal steroid and placebo groups (24.8 vs 22.0 mL/kg, p=0.19), suggesting structural lung changes from initial AS

Effect: null; 24.8 versus 22.0 mL/kg; CI: adjusted 95% CI for difference: -1.40 to 6.62

There was no significant difference in functional residual capacity between rescue antenatal steroid and placebo groups (24.8 vs 22.0 mL/kg, p=0.19), suggesting structural lung changes from initial AS

Effect: null; 24.8 versus 22.0 mL/kg; CI: adjusted 95% CI for difference: -1.40 to 6.62

There was no significant difference in functional residual capacity between rescue antenatal steroid and placebo groups (24.8 vs 22.0 mL/kg, p=0.19), suggesting structural lung changes from initial AS

Effect: null; 24.8 versus 22.0 mL/kg; CI: adjusted 95% CI for difference: -1.40 to 6.62

There was no significant difference in functional residual capacity between rescue antenatal steroid and placebo groups (24.8 vs 22.0 mL/kg, p=0.19), suggesting structural lung changes from initial AS

Effect: null; 24.8 versus 22.0 mL/kg; CI: adjusted 95% CI for difference: -1.40 to 6.62

There was no significant difference in functional residual capacity between rescue antenatal steroid and placebo groups (24.8 vs 22.0 mL/kg, p=0.19), suggesting structural lung changes from initial AS

Effect: null; 24.8 versus 22.0 mL/kg; CI: adjusted 95% CI for difference: -1.40 to 6.62

There was no significant difference in functional residual capacity between rescue antenatal steroid and placebo groups (24.8 vs 22.0 mL/kg, p=0.19), suggesting structural lung changes from initial AS

Effect: null; 24.8 versus 22.0 mL/kg; CI: adjusted 95% CI for difference: -1.40 to 6.62

There was no significant difference in functional residual capacity between rescue antenatal steroid and placebo groups (24.8 vs 22.0 mL/kg, p=0.19), suggesting structural lung changes from initial AS

Effect: null; 24.8 versus 22.0 mL/kg; CI: adjusted 95% CI for difference: -1.40 to 6.62

There was no significant difference in functional residual capacity between rescue antenatal steroid and placebo groups (24.8 vs 22.0 mL/kg, p=0.19), suggesting structural lung changes from initial AS

Effect: null; 24.8 versus 22.0 mL/kg; CI: adjusted 95% CI for difference: -1.40 to 6.62

There was no significant difference in functional residual capacity between rescue antenatal steroid and placebo groups (24.8 vs 22.0 mL/kg, p=0.19), suggesting structural lung changes from initial AS

Effect: null; 24.8 versus 22.0 mL/kg; CI: adjusted 95% CI for difference: -1.40 to 6.62

There was no significant difference in functional residual capacity between rescue antenatal steroid and placebo groups (24.8 vs 22.0 mL/kg, p=0.19), suggesting structural lung changes from initial AS

Effect: null; 24.8 versus 22.0 mL/kg; CI: adjusted 95% CI for difference: -1.40 to 6.62

There was no significant difference in functional residual capacity between rescue antenatal steroid and placebo groups (24.8 vs 22.0 mL/kg, p=0.19), suggesting structural lung changes from initial AS

Effect: null; 24.8 versus 22.0 mL/kg; CI: adjusted 95% CI for difference: -1.40 to 6.62

There was no significant difference in functional residual capacity between rescue antenatal steroid and placebo groups (24.8 vs 22.0 mL/kg, p=0.19), suggesting structural lung changes from initial AS

Effect: null; 24.8 versus 22.0 mL/kg; CI: adjusted 95% CI for difference: -1.40 to 6.62

There was no significant difference in functional residual capacity between rescue antenatal steroid and placebo groups (24.8 vs 22.0 mL/kg, p=0.19), suggesting structural lung changes from initial AS

Effect: null; 24.8 versus 22.0 mL/kg; CI: adjusted 95% CI for difference: -1.40 to 6.62

There was no significant difference in functional residual capacity between rescue antenatal steroid and placebo groups (24.8 vs 22.0 mL/kg, p=0.19), suggesting structural lung changes from initial AS

Effect: null; 24.8 versus 22.0 mL/kg; CI: adjusted 95% CI for difference: -1.40 to 6.62

There was no significant difference in functional residual capacity between rescue antenatal steroid and placebo groups (24.8 vs 22.0 mL/kg, p=0.19), suggesting structural lung changes from initial AS

Effect: null; 24.8 versus 22.0 mL/kg; CI: adjusted 95% CI for difference: -1.40 to 6.62

There was no significant difference in functional residual capacity between rescue antenatal steroid and placebo groups (24.8 vs 22.0 mL/kg, p=0.19), suggesting structural lung changes from initial AS

Effect: null; 24.8 versus 22.0 mL/kg; CI: adjusted 95% CI for difference: -1.40 to 6.62

There was no significant difference in functional residual capacity between rescue antenatal steroid and placebo groups (24.8 vs 22.0 mL/kg, p=0.19), suggesting structural lung changes from initial AS

Effect: null; 24.8 versus 22.0 mL/kg; CI: adjusted 95% CI for difference: -1.40 to 6.62

There was no significant difference in functional residual capacity between rescue antenatal steroid and placebo groups (24.8 vs 22.0 mL/kg, p=0.19), suggesting structural lung changes from initial AS

Effect: null; 24.8 versus 22.0 mL/kg; CI: adjusted 95% CI for difference: -1.40 to 6.62

There was no significant difference in functional residual capacity between rescue antenatal steroid and placebo groups (24.8 vs 22.0 mL/kg, p=0.19), suggesting structural lung changes from initial AS

Effect: null; 24.8 versus 22.0 mL/kg; CI: adjusted 95% CI for difference: -1.40 to 6.62

There was no significant difference in functional residual capacity between rescue antenatal steroid and placebo groups (24.8 vs 22.0 mL/kg, p=0.19), suggesting structural lung changes from initial AS

Effect: null; 24.8 versus 22.0 mL/kg; CI: adjusted 95% CI for difference: -1.40 to 6.62

There was no significant difference in functional residual capacity between rescue antenatal steroid and placebo groups (24.8 vs 22.0 mL/kg, p=0.19), suggesting structural lung changes from initial AS

Effect: null; 24.8 versus 22.0 mL/kg; CI: adjusted 95% CI for difference: -1.40 to 6.62

There was no significant difference in functional residual capacity between rescue antenatal steroid and placebo groups (24.8 vs 22.0 mL/kg, p=0.19), suggesting structural lung changes from initial AS

Effect: null; 24.8 versus 22.0 mL/kg; CI: adjusted 95% CI for difference: -1.40 to 6.62

There was no significant difference in functional residual capacity between rescue antenatal steroid and placebo groups (24.8 vs 22.0 mL/kg, p=0.19), suggesting structural lung changes from initial AS

Effect: null; 24.8 versus 22.0 mL/kg; CI: adjusted 95% CI for difference: -1.40 to 6.62

There was no significant difference in functional residual capacity between rescue antenatal steroid and placebo groups (24.8 vs 22.0 mL/kg, p=0.19), suggesting structural lung changes from initial AS

Effect: null; 24.8 versus 22.0 mL/kg; CI: adjusted 95% CI for difference: -1.40 to 6.62

There was no significant difference in functional residual capacity between rescue antenatal steroid and placebo groups (24.8 vs 22.0 mL/kg, p=0.19), suggesting structural lung changes from initial AS

Effect: null; 24.8 versus 22.0 mL/kg; CI: adjusted 95% CI for difference: -1.40 to 6.62

Significantly fewer infants in the rescue antenatal steroid group required >= 30% supplemental oxygen (13% vs 29%, p<0.05) or >= 40% oxygen (9% vs 23%, p<0.05) compared to placebo, demonstrating clini

Effect: improvement; 13% versus 29% requiring >= 30% oxygen

Significantly fewer infants in the rescue antenatal steroid group required >= 30% supplemental oxygen (13% vs 29%, p<0.05) or >= 40% oxygen (9% vs 23%, p<0.05) compared to placebo, demonstrating clini

Effect: improvement; 13% versus 29% requiring >= 30% oxygen

Significantly fewer infants in the rescue antenatal steroid group required >= 30% supplemental oxygen (13% vs 29%, p<0.05) or >= 40% oxygen (9% vs 23%, p<0.05) compared to placebo, demonstrating clini

Effect: improvement; 13% versus 29% requiring >= 30% oxygen

Significantly fewer infants in the rescue antenatal steroid group required >= 30% supplemental oxygen (13% vs 29%, p<0.05) or >= 40% oxygen (9% vs 23%, p<0.05) compared to placebo, demonstrating clini

Effect: improvement; 13% versus 29% requiring >= 30% oxygen

Significantly fewer infants in the rescue antenatal steroid group required >= 30% supplemental oxygen (13% vs 29%, p<0.05) or >= 40% oxygen (9% vs 23%, p<0.05) compared to placebo, demonstrating clini

Effect: improvement; 13% versus 29% requiring >= 30% oxygen

Significantly fewer infants in the rescue antenatal steroid group required >= 30% supplemental oxygen (13% vs 29%, p<0.05) or >= 40% oxygen (9% vs 23%, p<0.05) compared to placebo, demonstrating clini

Effect: improvement; 13% versus 29% requiring >= 30% oxygen

Significantly fewer infants in the rescue antenatal steroid group required >= 30% supplemental oxygen (13% vs 29%, p<0.05) or >= 40% oxygen (9% vs 23%, p<0.05) compared to placebo, demonstrating clini

Effect: improvement; 13% versus 29% requiring >= 30% oxygen

Significantly fewer infants in the rescue antenatal steroid group required >= 30% supplemental oxygen (13% vs 29%, p<0.05) or >= 40% oxygen (9% vs 23%, p<0.05) compared to placebo, demonstrating clini

Effect: improvement; 13% versus 29% requiring >= 30% oxygen

Significantly fewer infants in the rescue antenatal steroid group required >= 30% supplemental oxygen (13% vs 29%, p<0.05) or >= 40% oxygen (9% vs 23%, p<0.05) compared to placebo, demonstrating clini

Effect: improvement; 13% versus 29% requiring >= 30% oxygen

Significantly fewer infants in the rescue antenatal steroid group required >= 30% supplemental oxygen (13% vs 29%, p<0.05) or >= 40% oxygen (9% vs 23%, p<0.05) compared to placebo, demonstrating clini

Effect: improvement; 13% versus 29% requiring >= 30% oxygen

Significantly fewer infants in the rescue antenatal steroid group required >= 30% supplemental oxygen (13% vs 29%, p<0.05) or >= 40% oxygen (9% vs 23%, p<0.05) compared to placebo, demonstrating clini

Effect: improvement; 13% versus 29% requiring >= 30% oxygen

Significantly fewer infants in the rescue antenatal steroid group required >= 30% supplemental oxygen (13% vs 29%, p<0.05) or >= 40% oxygen (9% vs 23%, p<0.05) compared to placebo, demonstrating clini

Effect: improvement; 13% versus 29% requiring >= 30% oxygen

Significantly fewer infants in the rescue antenatal steroid group required >= 30% supplemental oxygen (13% vs 29%, p<0.05) or >= 40% oxygen (9% vs 23%, p<0.05) compared to placebo, demonstrating clini

Effect: improvement; 13% versus 29% requiring >= 30% oxygen

Significantly fewer infants in the rescue antenatal steroid group required >= 30% supplemental oxygen (13% vs 29%, p<0.05) or >= 40% oxygen (9% vs 23%, p<0.05) compared to placebo, demonstrating clini

Effect: improvement; 13% versus 29% requiring >= 30% oxygen

Significantly fewer infants in the rescue antenatal steroid group required >= 30% supplemental oxygen (13% vs 29%, p<0.05) or >= 40% oxygen (9% vs 23%, p<0.05) compared to placebo, demonstrating clini

Effect: improvement; 13% versus 29% requiring >= 30% oxygen

Significantly fewer infants in the rescue antenatal steroid group required >= 30% supplemental oxygen (13% vs 29%, p<0.05) or >= 40% oxygen (9% vs 23%, p<0.05) compared to placebo, demonstrating clini

Effect: improvement; 13% versus 29% requiring >= 30% oxygen

Significantly fewer infants in the rescue antenatal steroid group required >= 30% supplemental oxygen (13% vs 29%, p<0.05) or >= 40% oxygen (9% vs 23%, p<0.05) compared to placebo, demonstrating clini

Effect: improvement; 13% versus 29% requiring >= 30% oxygen

Significantly fewer infants in the rescue antenatal steroid group required >= 30% supplemental oxygen (13% vs 29%, p<0.05) or >= 40% oxygen (9% vs 23%, p<0.05) compared to placebo, demonstrating clini

Effect: improvement; 13% versus 29% requiring >= 30% oxygen

Significantly fewer infants in the rescue antenatal steroid group required >= 30% supplemental oxygen (13% vs 29%, p<0.05) or >= 40% oxygen (9% vs 23%, p<0.05) compared to placebo, demonstrating clini

Effect: improvement; 13% versus 29% requiring >= 30% oxygen

Significantly fewer infants in the rescue antenatal steroid group required >= 30% supplemental oxygen (13% vs 29%, p<0.05) or >= 40% oxygen (9% vs 23%, p<0.05) compared to placebo, demonstrating clini

Effect: improvement; 13% versus 29% requiring >= 30% oxygen

Significantly fewer infants in the rescue antenatal steroid group required >= 30% supplemental oxygen (13% vs 29%, p<0.05) or >= 40% oxygen (9% vs 23%, p<0.05) compared to placebo, demonstrating clini

Effect: improvement; 13% versus 29% requiring >= 30% oxygen

Significantly fewer infants in the rescue antenatal steroid group required >= 30% supplemental oxygen (13% vs 29%, p<0.05) or >= 40% oxygen (9% vs 23%, p<0.05) compared to placebo, demonstrating clini

Effect: improvement; 13% versus 29% requiring >= 30% oxygen

Significantly fewer infants in the rescue antenatal steroid group required >= 30% supplemental oxygen (13% vs 29%, p<0.05) or >= 40% oxygen (9% vs 23%, p<0.05) compared to placebo, demonstrating clini

Effect: improvement; 13% versus 29% requiring >= 30% oxygen