Psychological Distress

Patients in the experimental group who had PHQ results reviewed by their provider before the visit were significantly more likely to have discussion of psychological symptoms than the control group (6

Effect: improvement; 68% versus 49%

Patients in the experimental group who had PHQ results reviewed by their provider before the visit were significantly more likely to have discussion of psychological symptoms than the control group (6

Effect: improvement; 68% versus 49%

Patients in the experimental group who had PHQ results reviewed by their provider before the visit were significantly more likely to have discussion of psychological symptoms than the control group (6

Effect: improvement; 68% versus 49%

Patients in the experimental group who had PHQ results reviewed by their provider before the visit were significantly more likely to have discussion of psychological symptoms than the control group (6

Effect: improvement; 68% versus 49%

Patients in the experimental group who had PHQ results reviewed by their provider before the visit were significantly more likely to have discussion of psychological symptoms than the control group (6

Effect: improvement; 68% versus 49%

Patients in the experimental group who had PHQ results reviewed by their provider before the visit were significantly more likely to have discussion of psychological symptoms than the control group (6

Effect: improvement; 68% versus 49%

Patients in the experimental group who had PHQ results reviewed by their provider before the visit were significantly more likely to have discussion of psychological symptoms than the control group (6

Effect: improvement; 68% versus 49%

Patients in the experimental group who had PHQ results reviewed by their provider before the visit were significantly more likely to have discussion of psychological symptoms than the control group (6

Effect: improvement; 68% versus 49%

Patients in the experimental group who had PHQ results reviewed by their provider before the visit were significantly more likely to have discussion of psychological symptoms than the control group (6

Effect: improvement; 68% versus 49%

Patients in the experimental group who had PHQ results reviewed by their provider before the visit were significantly more likely to have discussion of psychological symptoms than the control group (6

Effect: improvement; 68% versus 49%

Patients in the experimental group who had PHQ results reviewed by their provider before the visit were significantly more likely to have discussion of psychological symptoms than the control group (6

Effect: improvement; 68% versus 49%

Patients in the experimental group who had PHQ results reviewed by their provider before the visit were significantly more likely to have discussion of psychological symptoms than the control group (6

Effect: improvement; 68% versus 49%

Patients in the experimental group who had PHQ results reviewed by their provider before the visit were significantly more likely to have discussion of psychological symptoms than the control group (6

Effect: improvement; 68% versus 49%

Patients in the experimental group who had PHQ results reviewed by their provider before the visit were significantly more likely to have discussion of psychological symptoms than the control group (6

Effect: improvement; 68% versus 49%

Patients in the experimental group who had PHQ results reviewed by their provider before the visit were significantly more likely to have discussion of psychological symptoms than the control group (6

Effect: improvement; 68% versus 49%

Patients in the experimental group who had PHQ results reviewed by their provider before the visit were significantly more likely to have discussion of psychological symptoms than the control group (6

Effect: improvement; 68% versus 49%

Patients in the experimental group who had PHQ results reviewed by their provider before the visit were significantly more likely to have discussion of psychological symptoms than the control group (6

Effect: improvement; 68% versus 49%

Patients in the experimental group who had PHQ results reviewed by their provider before the visit were significantly more likely to have discussion of psychological symptoms than the control group (6

Effect: improvement; 68% versus 49%

Patients in the experimental group who had PHQ results reviewed by their provider before the visit were significantly more likely to have discussion of psychological symptoms than the control group (6

Effect: improvement; 68% versus 49%

Patients in the experimental group who had PHQ results reviewed by their provider before the visit were significantly more likely to have discussion of psychological symptoms than the control group (6

Effect: improvement; 68% versus 49%

Patients in the experimental group who had PHQ results reviewed by their provider before the visit were significantly more likely to have discussion of psychological symptoms than the control group (6

Effect: improvement; 68% versus 49%

Patients in the experimental group who had PHQ results reviewed by their provider before the visit were significantly more likely to have discussion of psychological symptoms than the control group (6

Effect: improvement; 68% versus 49%

Patients in the experimental group who had PHQ results reviewed by their provider before the visit were significantly more likely to have discussion of psychological symptoms than the control group (6

Effect: improvement; 68% versus 49%

Patients in the experimental group who had PHQ results reviewed by their provider before the visit were significantly more likely to have discussion of psychological symptoms than the control group (6

Effect: improvement; 68% versus 49%

Patients in the experimental group who had PHQ results reviewed by their provider before the visit were significantly more likely to have discussion of psychological symptoms than the control group (6

Effect: improvement; 68% versus 49%

Patients in the experimental group who had PHQ results reviewed by their provider before the visit were significantly more likely to have discussion of psychological symptoms than the control group (6

Effect: improvement; 68% versus 49%

Patients in the experimental group who had PHQ results reviewed by their provider before the visit were significantly more likely to have discussion of psychological symptoms than the control group (6

Effect: improvement; 68% versus 49%

Medical providers with access to the PHQ prior to the visit were significantly more satisfied with their management of psychological problems (6.11 vs 5.56, P < 0.001) and with the visit as a whole (5

Effect: improvement; 6.11 versus 5.56 (psychological satisfaction); 5.89 versus 4.66 (overall satisfaction)

Medical providers with access to the PHQ prior to the visit were significantly more satisfied with their management of psychological problems (6.11 vs 5.56, P < 0.001) and with the visit as a whole (5

Effect: improvement; 6.11 versus 5.56 (psychological satisfaction); 5.89 versus 4.66 (overall satisfaction)

Medical providers with access to the PHQ prior to the visit were significantly more satisfied with their management of psychological problems (6.11 vs 5.56, P < 0.001) and with the visit as a whole (5

Effect: improvement; 6.11 versus 5.56 (psychological satisfaction); 5.89 versus 4.66 (overall satisfaction)

Medical providers with access to the PHQ prior to the visit were significantly more satisfied with their management of psychological problems (6.11 vs 5.56, P < 0.001) and with the visit as a whole (5

Effect: improvement; 6.11 versus 5.56 (psychological satisfaction); 5.89 versus 4.66 (overall satisfaction)

Medical providers with access to the PHQ prior to the visit were significantly more satisfied with their management of psychological problems (6.11 vs 5.56, P < 0.001) and with the visit as a whole (5

Effect: improvement; 6.11 versus 5.56 (psychological satisfaction); 5.89 versus 4.66 (overall satisfaction)

Medical providers with access to the PHQ prior to the visit were significantly more satisfied with their management of psychological problems (6.11 vs 5.56, P < 0.001) and with the visit as a whole (5

Effect: improvement; 6.11 versus 5.56 (psychological satisfaction); 5.89 versus 4.66 (overall satisfaction)

Medical providers with access to the PHQ prior to the visit were significantly more satisfied with their management of psychological problems (6.11 vs 5.56, P < 0.001) and with the visit as a whole (5

Effect: improvement; 6.11 versus 5.56 (psychological satisfaction); 5.89 versus 4.66 (overall satisfaction)

Medical providers with access to the PHQ prior to the visit were significantly more satisfied with their management of psychological problems (6.11 vs 5.56, P < 0.001) and with the visit as a whole (5

Effect: improvement; 6.11 versus 5.56 (psychological satisfaction); 5.89 versus 4.66 (overall satisfaction)

Medical providers with access to the PHQ prior to the visit were significantly more satisfied with their management of psychological problems (6.11 vs 5.56, P < 0.001) and with the visit as a whole (5

Effect: improvement; 6.11 versus 5.56 (psychological satisfaction); 5.89 versus 4.66 (overall satisfaction)

Medical providers with access to the PHQ prior to the visit were significantly more satisfied with their management of psychological problems (6.11 vs 5.56, P < 0.001) and with the visit as a whole (5

Effect: improvement; 6.11 versus 5.56 (psychological satisfaction); 5.89 versus 4.66 (overall satisfaction)

Medical providers with access to the PHQ prior to the visit were significantly more satisfied with their management of psychological problems (6.11 vs 5.56, P < 0.001) and with the visit as a whole (5

Effect: improvement; 6.11 versus 5.56 (psychological satisfaction); 5.89 versus 4.66 (overall satisfaction)

Medical providers with access to the PHQ prior to the visit were significantly more satisfied with their management of psychological problems (6.11 vs 5.56, P < 0.001) and with the visit as a whole (5

Effect: improvement; 6.11 versus 5.56 (psychological satisfaction); 5.89 versus 4.66 (overall satisfaction)

Medical providers with access to the PHQ prior to the visit were significantly more satisfied with their management of psychological problems (6.11 vs 5.56, P < 0.001) and with the visit as a whole (5

Effect: improvement; 6.11 versus 5.56 (psychological satisfaction); 5.89 versus 4.66 (overall satisfaction)

Medical providers with access to the PHQ prior to the visit were significantly more satisfied with their management of psychological problems (6.11 vs 5.56, P < 0.001) and with the visit as a whole (5

Effect: improvement; 6.11 versus 5.56 (psychological satisfaction); 5.89 versus 4.66 (overall satisfaction)

Medical providers with access to the PHQ prior to the visit were significantly more satisfied with their management of psychological problems (6.11 vs 5.56, P < 0.001) and with the visit as a whole (5

Effect: improvement; 6.11 versus 5.56 (psychological satisfaction); 5.89 versus 4.66 (overall satisfaction)

Medical providers with access to the PHQ prior to the visit were significantly more satisfied with their management of psychological problems (6.11 vs 5.56, P < 0.001) and with the visit as a whole (5

Effect: improvement; 6.11 versus 5.56 (psychological satisfaction); 5.89 versus 4.66 (overall satisfaction)

Medical providers with access to the PHQ prior to the visit were significantly more satisfied with their management of psychological problems (6.11 vs 5.56, P < 0.001) and with the visit as a whole (5

Effect: improvement; 6.11 versus 5.56 (psychological satisfaction); 5.89 versus 4.66 (overall satisfaction)

Medical providers with access to the PHQ prior to the visit were significantly more satisfied with their management of psychological problems (6.11 vs 5.56, P < 0.001) and with the visit as a whole (5

Effect: improvement; 6.11 versus 5.56 (psychological satisfaction); 5.89 versus 4.66 (overall satisfaction)

Medical providers with access to the PHQ prior to the visit were significantly more satisfied with their management of psychological problems (6.11 vs 5.56, P < 0.001) and with the visit as a whole (5

Effect: improvement; 6.11 versus 5.56 (psychological satisfaction); 5.89 versus 4.66 (overall satisfaction)

Medical providers with access to the PHQ prior to the visit were significantly more satisfied with their management of psychological problems (6.11 vs 5.56, P < 0.001) and with the visit as a whole (5

Effect: improvement; 6.11 versus 5.56 (psychological satisfaction); 5.89 versus 4.66 (overall satisfaction)

Medical providers with access to the PHQ prior to the visit were significantly more satisfied with their management of psychological problems (6.11 vs 5.56, P < 0.001) and with the visit as a whole (5

Effect: improvement; 6.11 versus 5.56 (psychological satisfaction); 5.89 versus 4.66 (overall satisfaction)

Medical providers with access to the PHQ prior to the visit were significantly more satisfied with their management of psychological problems (6.11 vs 5.56, P < 0.001) and with the visit as a whole (5

Effect: improvement; 6.11 versus 5.56 (psychological satisfaction); 5.89 versus 4.66 (overall satisfaction)

Medical providers with access to the PHQ prior to the visit were significantly more satisfied with their management of psychological problems (6.11 vs 5.56, P < 0.001) and with the visit as a whole (5

Effect: improvement; 6.11 versus 5.56 (psychological satisfaction); 5.89 versus 4.66 (overall satisfaction)