Male stress urinary incontinence surgical mesh
Related entities
Findings (27)
None
nullCombination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i
Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
nullCombination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i
Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
nullCombination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i
Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
nullCombination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i
Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
nullCombination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i
Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
nullCombination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i
Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
nullCombination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i
Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
nullCombination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i
Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
nullCombination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i
Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
nullCombination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i
Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
nullCombination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i
Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
nullCombination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i
Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
nullCombination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i
Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
nullCombination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i
Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
nullCombination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i
Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
nullCombination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i
Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
nullCombination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i
Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
nullCombination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i
Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
nullCombination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i
Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
nullCombination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i
Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
nullCombination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i
Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
nullCombination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i
Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
nullCombination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i
Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
nullCombination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i
Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
nullCombination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i
Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
nullCombination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i
Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
nullCombination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i
Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group