ExploreConditionMale stress urinary incontinence surgical mesh
Condition

Male stress urinary incontinence surgical mesh

Also known as: Male stress urinary incontinence surgical mesh Male stress urinary incontinence surgical mesh (physical object) stress urinary incontinence; stress-predominant mixed urinary incontinence SUI UI MALE
3 findings 1 paper 3 related entities View in graph →

Related entities

interventions
outcomes
studys

Findings (27)

None
null

Combination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i

Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group

Size: 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
null

Combination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i

Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group

Size: 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
null

Combination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i

Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group

Size: 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
null

Combination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i

Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group

Size: 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
null

Combination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i

Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group

Size: 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
null

Combination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i

Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group

Size: 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
null

Combination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i

Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group

Size: 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
null

Combination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i

Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group

Size: 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
null

Combination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i

Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group

Size: 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
null

Combination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i

Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group

Size: 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
null

Combination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i

Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group

Size: 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
null

Combination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i

Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group

Size: 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
null

Combination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i

Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group

Size: 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
null

Combination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i

Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group

Size: 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
null

Combination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i

Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group

Size: 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
null

Combination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i

Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group

Size: 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
null

Combination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i

Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group

Size: 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
null

Combination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i

Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group

Size: 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
null

Combination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i

Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group

Size: 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
null

Combination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i

Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group

Size: 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
null

Combination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i

Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group

Size: 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
null

Combination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i

Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group

Size: 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
null

Combination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i

Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group

Size: 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
null

Combination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i

Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group

Size: 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
null

Combination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i

Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group

Size: 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
null

Combination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i

Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group

Size: 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group
None
null

Combination therapy (pessary + behavioral) was not superior to single-modality therapy because, although it was better than pessary alone on PGI-I (53% vs 40%, p=0.02) and PFDI (44% vs 33%, p=0.05), i

Effect: null; 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group

Size: 53% PGI-I, 44% PFDI for combined group

Papers (1)