Major Depressive Disorder 2

ERT produced statistically and clinically significant reductions in depression severity compared to modified attention control, with large effect sizes on MDD CSR and BDI-II, and 63% of the comorbid M

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .82

ERT produced statistically and clinically significant reductions in depression severity compared to modified attention control, with large effect sizes on MDD CSR and BDI-II, and 63% of the comorbid M

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .82

ERT produced statistically and clinically significant reductions in depression severity compared to modified attention control, with large effect sizes on MDD CSR and BDI-II, and 63% of the comorbid M

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .82

ERT produced statistically and clinically significant reductions in depression severity compared to modified attention control, with large effect sizes on MDD CSR and BDI-II, and 63% of the comorbid M

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .82

ERT produced statistically and clinically significant reductions in depression severity compared to modified attention control, with large effect sizes on MDD CSR and BDI-II, and 63% of the comorbid M

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .82

ERT produced statistically and clinically significant reductions in depression severity compared to modified attention control, with large effect sizes on MDD CSR and BDI-II, and 63% of the comorbid M

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .82

ERT produced statistically and clinically significant reductions in depression severity compared to modified attention control, with large effect sizes on MDD CSR and BDI-II, and 63% of the comorbid M

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .82

ERT produced statistically and clinically significant reductions in depression severity compared to modified attention control, with large effect sizes on MDD CSR and BDI-II, and 63% of the comorbid M

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .82

ERT produced statistically and clinically significant reductions in depression severity compared to modified attention control, with large effect sizes on MDD CSR and BDI-II, and 63% of the comorbid M

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .82

ERT produced statistically and clinically significant reductions in depression severity compared to modified attention control, with large effect sizes on MDD CSR and BDI-II, and 63% of the comorbid M

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .82

ERT produced statistically and clinically significant reductions in depression severity compared to modified attention control, with large effect sizes on MDD CSR and BDI-II, and 63% of the comorbid M

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .82

ERT produced statistically and clinically significant reductions in depression severity compared to modified attention control, with large effect sizes on MDD CSR and BDI-II, and 63% of the comorbid M

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .82

ERT produced statistically and clinically significant reductions in depression severity compared to modified attention control, with large effect sizes on MDD CSR and BDI-II, and 63% of the comorbid M

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .82

ERT produced statistically and clinically significant reductions in depression severity compared to modified attention control, with large effect sizes on MDD CSR and BDI-II, and 63% of the comorbid M

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .82

ERT produced statistically and clinically significant reductions in depression severity compared to modified attention control, with large effect sizes on MDD CSR and BDI-II, and 63% of the comorbid M

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .82

ERT produced statistically and clinically significant reductions in depression severity compared to modified attention control, with large effect sizes on MDD CSR and BDI-II, and 63% of the comorbid M

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .82

ERT produced statistically and clinically significant reductions in depression severity compared to modified attention control, with large effect sizes on MDD CSR and BDI-II, and 63% of the comorbid M

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .82

ERT produced statistically and clinically significant reductions in depression severity compared to modified attention control, with large effect sizes on MDD CSR and BDI-II, and 63% of the comorbid M

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .82

ERT produced statistically and clinically significant reductions in depression severity compared to modified attention control, with large effect sizes on MDD CSR and BDI-II, and 63% of the comorbid M

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .82

ERT produced statistically and clinically significant reductions in depression severity compared to modified attention control, with large effect sizes on MDD CSR and BDI-II, and 63% of the comorbid M

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .82

ERT produced statistically and clinically significant reductions in depression severity compared to modified attention control, with large effect sizes on MDD CSR and BDI-II, and 63% of the comorbid M

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .82

ERT produced statistically and clinically significant reductions in depression severity compared to modified attention control, with large effect sizes on MDD CSR and BDI-II, and 63% of the comorbid M

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .82

ERT produced statistically and clinically significant reductions in depression severity compared to modified attention control, with large effect sizes on MDD CSR and BDI-II, and 63% of the comorbid M

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .82

ERT produced statistically and clinically significant reductions in depression severity compared to modified attention control, with large effect sizes on MDD CSR and BDI-II, and 63% of the comorbid M

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .82

ERT produced statistically and clinically significant reductions in depression severity compared to modified attention control, with large effect sizes on MDD CSR and BDI-II, and 63% of the comorbid M

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .82

ERT produced statistically and clinically significant reductions in depression severity compared to modified attention control, with large effect sizes on MDD CSR and BDI-II, and 63% of the comorbid M

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .82

ERT produced statistically and clinically significant reductions in depression severity compared to modified attention control, with large effect sizes on MDD CSR and BDI-II, and 63% of the comorbid M

Effect: improvement; Hedge's g = .82